One of the task of the Marketing team is to have a list of Talking Points ready to help Ambassadors and Marketing members to publicize each release.
This issue is a call for help with this for Fedora Atomic F26 Talking points
Thanks in advance for your cooperation with us.
Assigning to jberkus.
Metadata Update from @dustymabe: - Issue assigned to jberkus
So, will F26 Atomic have containerized Kubernetes? How about OverlayFS?
@jberkus:
@x3mboy - what is the deadline for this. @jberkus is attending conferences for the next few weeks.
@dustymabe We are trying to get them before alpha release. But as soon as you can.
hey @x3mboy I don't think we'll have anything before @jberkus get's back. I'm hoping that isn't too disruptive.
@dustymabe well, the more important thing is to answer what we'll have; if we know that, I can do the talking points on the plane.
Like, when are we going to decide about containerized kubernetes?
Is there any advance on this? Today is the Alpha release, but we can work with this to the Beta Release.
I have nothing. I've been travelling, and I don'tknow the status on the various changes proposed for F26. @dustymabe @jasonbrooks @roshi @kushal Please comment.
Apologies, I also don't know the status of the various changes for F26. I haven't interjected in this thread precisely because I have no information to add to it. :(
Here's what I have per Dusty:
Can we combine 3 & 5 into one point?
With https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/c/785b27dfeeeb6055af8b6581c247ca1412128dd6?branch=f25 did we actually start shipping more locales with atomic? That happened during 25 but after 25 first shipped.
These need some processing to suss out what's important, but f25 GA to current f26 is:
Yeah, we should definitely add something about System Containers.
Thanks for your feedback, it looks amazing. I will summarize, please let me know if this is ok, and then I will copy it to the wiki:
The final Talking Points should looks like:
With these changes we solve a lots of bugs reported and issues like:
Looks good, we just need to supply some descriptions. I'd like to replace the OStree-related changes with:
OSTree-Driven Releases The OSTree release dates now determine both the two-week release content and the media filenames, meaning that the OSTree update is the release. These OSTree releases are GPG-verified.
@jberkus That comment should replace the last 3 points, Am I right?
Yes.
@x3mboy I thought we were supposed to have a meeting 20 min ago, but you haven't been on IRC.
@jberkus sorry, I was sick that day. Can we set a new time and date for the meeting?
@jberkus finally met (sorry for that, it's totally on me). Now Talking Points are ready:
Fedora Atomic Talking Points
Also, he comment that Cockpit and Atomic CLI version will be newer for Final Release, so I will ping him at the #fedora-cloud IRC channel before the release, to update those points.
Thanks so much for your help and for your amazing work.
See you around.
Great work guys. These look really polished! - one final nit:
OSTree-driven releases - The OSTree release dates now determine both the two-week release content and the media filenames, meaning that the OSTree update is the release. These OSTree releases are GPG-verified.
f26 is out - and I think this can be closed
Metadata Update from @dustymabe: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.