rpm-ostree rojig (special way of delivering ostree updates)

I feel like we've almost over talked about rpm-ostree jigdo/rojig as a group but, if @walters is good with it I'd be OK with it as a topic

I feel like we've almost over talked about rpm-ostree jigdo/rojig as a group

I agree, not sure it needs to be a VFAD topic.

I feel like we've almost over talked about rpm-ostree jigdo/rojig as a group

I agree, not sure it needs to be a VFAD topic.

I thought the reason we wanted to bring it up was because there were questions related to the intersection of that and modularity.

I feel like we've almost over talked about rpm-ostree jigdo/rojig as a group
I agree, not sure it needs to be a VFAD topic.

I thought the reason we wanted to bring it up was because there were questions related to the intersection of that and modularity.

I'd also like to hear about it so wouldn't mind that topic - ELI5 style, please. Might also uncover possible issues. Explaining the basics instead of getting caught up in details usually does.

Edit: formatting

I thought the reason we wanted to bring it up was because there were questions related to the intersection of that and modularity.

Ok, if it is something we haven't discussed yet then I'd :thumbsup:. Do you mind posting or linking to the question(s). I may be a bit out of this specific loop.

I thought the reason we wanted to bring it up was because there were questions related to the intersection of that and modularity.

Ah...I'm not certain; like whether rpm-ostree would learn about modules? Or the other way around of building AH from a module (that's dead with new "addon modularity" right?)

I think we need to brainstorm a bit on other topics too and then choose among them.

What about oc cluster up usability/packaging? Personally it drives me nuts that it uses a hardcoded password by default. Should we add it to FAW by default? I notice it's now "just" 40MB.

Or hacking on the docs and our general docs story.

Or a podman focus?

Or maybe CI?

What about oc cluster up usability/packaging? Personally it drives me nuts that it uses a hardcoded password by default. Should we add it to FAW by default? I notice it's now "just" 40MB.

Not a bad idea. Worth discussing IMHO as it provides a way for developers to easily develop against Openshift on FAW. Same question for minishift.

Or hacking on the docs and our general docs story.

@sanja has done a lot of work in that area. What do you think @sanja?

Or a podman focus?

Brent has ping'd on issues related to podman so it may be a good time.

• Evaluate podman for inclusion in atomic host
• AH with Podman for CI tests only

Or maybe CI?

Something CI would be good. Problem here is it is a really broad topic :smile:. If we can pin it down to a few pain points or wanted changes then it could be a good discussion topic.

discussed in the meeting today here is the list of topics (I will update the description):

[upstream technology]

• (walters) rpm-ostree rojig - short presentation/demo (from walters) [5 minutes]
• (walters) rpm-ostree rojig - Q&A [ max 10 minutes ]
• (micah) podman - pros/cons to including it in the host vs using as a container (micah) [ 10 minutes ]

[community direction]

• (sanja) closing the communication channels ticket anyway and explaining on video why [ 10 minutes ]
• (sanja) discussion on whether Project Atomic needs to step away from the "umbrella" and make it clear what it's about, spin off projects [ 30 minutes ]

[Atomic workstation]

• (sanja) suggestion for rebranding atomic workstation [ 20 minutes ]
• (walters) dev/pet container tools - gather links to examples/docs [ 10 minutes ]
• (walters) Minimizing content set in FAW [ 10 minutes ]
  • https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/pull-request/74

[Q&A for users]

• (walters) Q&A session for atomic host/workstation users [ 20 minutes ]

Any plans talking about container images? (delivery, automation, future plans, OSBS status and plans, testing) Sorry I did not attend the meeting.

Any plans talking about container images? (delivery, automation, future plans, OSBS status and plans, testing) Sorry I did not attend the meeting.

Not for this VFAD since we already have a loaded agenda. Next one?

Can we add this to the Atomic calendar? https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/atomic/
Hopefully this isn't a selfish request and there's other people who have it linked to their calendar app of choice! :)

The vFAD is complete. Thanks to everyone who came

• etherpad link
• recordinglink
• etherpad pdf ( below)