@lsm5 @fkluknav @runcom

What is the current plans in Fedora in terms of going beyond version 1.13 for the Docker package in Fedora?

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:03:25PM +0000, Steve Milner wrote:

=20
smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following:
@lsm5 @fkluknav @runcom=20 =20 What is the current plans in Fedora in terms of going beyond version 1.13= for the Docker package in Fedora?
=20
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/394

We're going to include moby as "moby-engine" package in Fedora. Review requ=
est
upcoming..

HTH.

--=20
Lokesh
IRC: lsm5
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
https://keybase.io/lsm5

Solution to use docker-ce 17.09 from the Docker Inc. repos based on the docker-centos syscontainer.
https://gitlab.cern.ch/cloud/atomic-system-containers/commits/cern-qa/docker-centos

We use it with swarm mode. So far we didn't face any problems, oh, we need some extra selinux policies for our custom drivers. Maybe there are some things to fix regarding selinux.

@lsm5 Thanks ... when the review request goes in please add the link to this issue so the atomic-wg can keep an eye/help.

We're going to include moby as "moby-engine" package in Fedora.

Is this going to wholesale replace the docker rpm or something that is done in parallel? If you're doing a new package review then it sounds like its something that would live at the same time.

Is this something we should consider for F28?

I think walters meant to put this comment in this ticket:

Related: https://github.com/projectatomic/docker/issues/287

@lsm5 reminder, when the review starts please let us know.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539161

Thanks!