Learn more about these different git repos.
Other Git URLs
Please unretire master branches for packages:
jmc jmc-core directory-maven-plugin owasp-java-encoder
This is to meet requirements: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2406
Thanks!
Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)
@jkang The packages are retired for more than 8 weeks (2 years) which requires a re-review of the package.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
Please reopen the ticket once all the re-reviews are approved.
Metadata Update from @mohanboddu: - Issue close_status updated to: Get back later - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open) - Issue tagged with: low-gain, low-trouble, ops
Metadata Update from @mohanboddu: - Issue close_status updated to: Get back later - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
@mohanboddu The packages have active branches (jmc and/or jmc7) for modules that are delivered since F29+ via modules/jmc [1]. Is the claiming ownership of retired package process still required?
jmc
jmc7
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/jmc See branches 'latest' and '7'
Yes it is still technically required. However, if you feel like you would be wasting your time with that, I'd gladly review all 4 packages in one bugzilla, please just share links to 4 spec files and 4 SRPMs.
@churchyard Thank you, that would be appreciated. I have filed a review request with the 4 specs and srpms here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636
I've approved all 4 packages in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)
The packages are now unretired for the master branch.
Metadata Update from @humaton: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Thanks all!
Log in to comment on this ticket.