#7551 Self contained change review request - Festival
Closed: It's all good 2 years ago by mohanboddu. Opened 3 years ago by tyrylu.

I'd like someone from release engineering to review this proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Update_festival_to_2.5

Metadata Update from @mohanboddu:
- Issue tagged with: changes, f29

3 years ago

Hey @mohanboddu, @kellin — Lukáš is ready to get this into rawhide and isn't quite sure what next steps to take. This is going from one big package from disparate sources to several separate packages (speech-tools will be separate, and each voice will be its own package, now). How do you recommend landing this in Rawhide?

@mattdm - since the package has been divided into more packages then each of the new packages must go through the package review process.

@tyrylu can start building the new festival and all its packages in rawhide once all of these new packages are approved.

Metadata Update from @kellin:
- Issue tagged with: change-noreleng

3 years ago

Hello. The procedure for almost all of them is clear to me, but what about the festival package, which already exist? Will it go through some temporary removal and then be handled as any other new package?

@tyrylu - once all the other packages are approved then make your changes in the current festival package in dist-git to match the new package structure and then start building the package.

I would suggest that you file another ticket at this point to request a side-tag so you can build all of them 'outside' the main build target just for extra safety.

Let @mohanboddu or I know if you have any other questions.

@tyrylu - I updated the ticket title to make it easier for @mohanboddu and I to find it when browsing/searching.

Hello. I have the speech_tools dependency successfully reviewed, so in theory, i could add it to the repos, however, so far i lack the packager privileges. Could someone help with that?
Thank you. Of course, the blocked by field of the review bug is set.

Thank you. I would gladly post the other packages for a review, however, they all in the end depend on the first, so how you see a successful review chances?

@tyrylu , what is the status of this package review?

Partial success - speech-tools is in, but i discovered an efford to do the same at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457878, so i thought that i'll not go with the festival package itself, but the decision appears not to be as good as thought...

Closing this ticket, please reopen if you need anything else from us.

Metadata Update from @mohanboddu:
- Issue close_status updated to: It's all good
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

2 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.