https://mdapi.fedoraproject.org/branches lists the following. epel9 seems to be missing.
["dist-6E", "dist-6E-epel", "epel7", "epel8", "f28", "f29", "f30", "f31", "f32", "f33", "f34", "f35", "f36", "f37", "f38", "f39", "fc36", "koji", "rawhide", "src_dist-6E", "src_dist-6E-epel", "src_epel7", "src_epel8", "src_f29", "src_f30", "src_f31", "src_f32", "src_f33", "src_f34", "src_f35", "src_f36", "src_f37", "src_f38", "src_f39", "src_fc36", "src_rawhide"]
This is related to https://github.com/badges/shields/issues/9589
Metadata Update from @phsmoura: - Issue tagged with: medium-gain, medium-trouble, ops
cc: @t0xic0der
Just wanted to add that epel9 doesn't work when retrieving information about a package, either:
epel9
Metadata Update from @humaton: - Issue assigned to humaton
Hi, I have opened PR with mdapi and it was merged. Waiting for upstream release, once done and deployed in infra I will update this ticket.
Hi, I have opened PR with mdapi and it was merged.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/mdapi/pull/225
a new version of MDAPI is deployed in prod, please check it and reopen this ticket if there are any issues with the epel9 branches.
Metadata Update from @humaton: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Seems to be working. Do we need to do anything to make sure this doesn't happen with future EPEL versions?
@aviso There was an issue filed in the EPEL issue tracker, so we're looking at it now to make sure EPEL 10 works correctly.
@carlwgeorge That's great! Thanks for the heads up!
Log in to comment on this ticket.