#26237 New Repo for "rpms/qca-qt4"
Closed: Invalid 3 years ago by limb. Opened 3 years ago by rdieter.

{
 "action": "new_repo",
 "branch": "master",
 "bug_id": 1850780,
 "description": "",
 "exception": false,
 "monitor": "monitoring",
 "namespace": "rpms",
 "repo": "qca-qt4",
 "summary": "Qt4 Cryptographic Architecture",
 "upstreamurl": ""
}

The Bugzilla bug's review is approved by the person creating the bug. This is not allowed.

Metadata Update from @limb:
- Issue close_status updated to: Invalid
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

3 years ago

This is a compat package per guideline
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Review_Purpose

I was told this is a valid use-case that doesn't require a review.

Metadata Update from @rdieter:
- Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)

3 years ago

In particular,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Process

"The package is being created so that multiple versions of the same package can coexist in the distribution. The package MUST be properly named according to the naming guidelines and MUST NOT conflict with all other versions of the same package. "

The Bugzilla bug's review is approved by the person creating the bug. This is not allowed.

Metadata Update from @limb:
- Issue close_status updated to: Invalid
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

3 years ago

how are exceptions supposed to be handled then? Clearly I did something wrong, can you tell me what is the right way to do it?

Metadata Update from @rdieter:
- Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)

3 years ago

The Bugzilla bug provided is not assigned to anyone

Metadata Update from @limb:
- Issue close_status updated to: Invalid
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

3 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata