neuro-sig / NeuroFedora

#564 Consider moving our bi-weekly meeting to a meeting room
Closed: Fixed by ankursinha. Opened by gui1ty.

Closed: Fixed
Reopen Issue

I have been following the discussion on holding meetings in dedicated meeting rooms. Based on that discussion, I was wondering if we should consider moving our biweekly meeting into a meeting room.

Pro:
- more exposure
- with more exposure, potentially more people willing to join neuro-sig

Con:
- ...

Yeh, I don't mind either way. The only con is that folks that only want to see what's going on in the neuro-sig have to watch another channel for the meetings, but I'll make sure I put the logs in our channel for them too, so that should be OK.

All the 3 meeting rooms were free today. So we can use any of those. Maybe we go with meeting-2, which should be least active?

we could use fedocal to send out automated announcements, or I'm also happy to keep doing it to give it a human touch :)

Done now. We meet in the "meeting" room. I still send out manual reminders because fedocal doesn't do it the way we want

Metadata Update from @ankursinha:
- Issue close_status updated to: Fixed
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

This ticket has been migrated to the forgejo instance. Please find the new ticket here
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/neuro/NeuroFedora//issues/564
Metadata
None

T: Community

None
None
Low
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.