neuro-sig / NeuroFedora

#393 Why are we maintaining PEGTL?
Closed: Fixed by ankursinha. Opened by ankursinha.

Closed: Fixed
Reopen Issue

I see PEGTL in our list, and somehow I'm the primary admin. It must've been orphaned, and I must've picked it up as a neuro-sig package. But, nothing seems to use it, and it isn't a neuroscience tool either. So why are we maintaining it?

$ sudo dnf repoquery --release rawhide --source whatrequires PEGTL-devel
...
Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:28 ago on Tue 08 Sep 2020 10:08:46 BST.
PEGTL-2.8.1-2.fc32.src.rpm

Is this query correct, for a start?

Metadata Update from @ankursinha:
- Issue assigned to ankursinha

mailed @alakatos asking if they want to take over, since they have made the latest commit.

The package has been transferred to @alakatos . The neuro-sig is still co-maintaining it, but we're no longer the primary point of contact---which is good since none of us seem to be using PEGTL at the moment.

Metadata Update from @ankursinha:
- Issue close_status updated to: Fixed
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

This ticket has been migrated to the forgejo instance. Please find the new ticket here
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/neuro/NeuroFedora//issues/393
Metadata

D: Easy T: Software

None
None
Low
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.