fedmod provides tools for working with Fedora's modulemd metadata format that aren't related to actually building them (for build commands, see fedpkg and mbs-build).
Currently, this consists of:
fedmod <query-command>
: simple repoquery-like commands providing operations
like listing modules, resolving dependencies for packages, finding out
where a certain package is, etc. See below for a full list of available query
subcommands.fedmod lint
: check modulemd documents for validity and flag errorsfedmod fetch-metadata
: download the package and module metadata needed
to generate draft module definitionsfedmod rpm2module
: generates a draft modulemd file based on
the given RPM name (multiple RPM names can be given, but the resulting
draft module will lack any descriptive metadata in that case)fedmod rpm2flatpak
: generates a draft modulemd file and container.yaml
the given RPM namefedmod flatpak-report
': generates a JSON report about the packages in the
Flatpak runtime and not in the Flatpak runtime that would be required for
turning the specified list of rpms into Flatpaks. This is used for maintaining
the Fedora Flatpak runtime, but is likely not very useful otherwise.fedmod summarize-module
: Prints a summary of available modules.List all modules
Lists all modules available.
$ fedmod list-modules module1 module2 ...
List all modularized packages
Lists all packages that have been modularized. It can optionally list only duplicate packages, and show in which modules every package is.
$ fedmod list-rpms pkg1 pkg2 ... $ fedmod list-rpms --duplicate-only pkg2 ... $ fedmod list-rpms --list-modules pkg1 (module1) pkg2 (module2, module3) ...
Resolve package dependencies
Resolve package dependencies which is useful for creating new modules. User can also specify modular dependencies.
$ fedmod resolve-deps pkg pkg2 pkg3 pkg4 ... $ fedmod resolve-deps -m host -m platform pkg pkg3
Passing the --json
option both requests additional information about
dependencies (giving the SRPM name and runtime requirements for each RPM), and
changes the output format to be a structured JSON list rather than just a
simple list of names:
$ fedmod resolve-deps --json setup [ { "requires": { "system-release": [ "fedora-release-27-1.noarch" ] }, "rpm": "setup-2.10.10-1.fc27.noarch", "srpm": "setup-2.10.10-1.fc27.src" }, { "requires": { "fedora-gpg-keys = 27-1": [ "fedora-gpg-keys-27-1.noarch" ], "system-release(27)": [ "fedora-release-27-1.noarch" ] }, "rpm": "fedora-repos-27-1.noarch", "srpm": "fedora-repos-27-1.src" }, { "requires": {}, "rpm": "fedora-gpg-keys-27-1.noarch", "srpm": "fedora-repos-27-1.src" } ]
Find package in modules
Finds out whether a certain package has been modularized and in which module(s).
$fedmod where-is-package pkg module1 module2
List packages of a module
Lists all packages in a given module. Can also list full NEVRAs.
$ fedmod module-packages module pkg1 pkg2 $ fedmod module-packages --full-nevra module pkg1-0:2.4.28-3.module_e7ab08d3.x86_64 pkg2-0:4.5.20-1.module_e7ab08d3.x86_64
Lookup RPMs from SRPM
Lists all the RPMs generated by the specified SRPM package name.
$ ./fedmod rpms-from-srpm spkg pkg1 pkg2 pkg3 ...
Lookup SRPM of RPM
Return the SRPM package name that generates the passed RPM
$ ./fedmod srpm-of-rpm pkg1 spkg
Before generating any draft modulemd files, first run the following command to fetch and locally cache the required metadata files:
$ fedmod fetch-metadata
fedmod rpm2module [RPM NAMES]
will then create a modulemd file from the
given package names and emit it on stdout
. The YAML metadata can be written
directly to a file instead by passing the `--output
(or -o
) option:
$ fedmod rpm2module -o graphite-web.yaml graphite-web
Only module level build dependencies are generated by default - there is no
attempt to make the generated module definition self-hosting. If a self-hosting
module is desired, then the --build-deps N
option can be passed, where N
is
the number of levels of recursive build dependencies to attempt to include (this
can quickly become unmanageable due to dependencies on build tools that
themselves have complex build requirements, but are not yet part of a defined
module)
The following metadata is currently used as input to the draft module generation process:
Package dependency definitions are pulled from the regular Fedora
release and updates repositories, with the metadata being downloaded for
local use via the fedmod fetch-metadata
command
Descriptive metadata is taken from the system running fedmod
. Due to this,
fedmod
currently only supports Fedora 26+. (This will be fixed to use
the same repository metadata as is used for package dependency resolution)
Module dependencies currently err on the side of making the generated modules smaller by permitting generated modules to depend on packages that aren't listed as part of the public API of other modules. This reflects the fact that those transitive dependencies are typically the reason for the lower level modules appearing in the dependency set in the first place, as well as the fact that true dependency isolation will start being enforced once modules begin including opaque container images, such that only the client libraries are installed into shared environments.
Other limitations in generated modulemd
files:
components
are only given a name and rationale, relying on the default
settings for everything elseIf you want to contribute to fedmod, the recommended way is to fork the project
on Pagure, develop your changes in a
feature branch and submit a pull request against the upstream master
branch.
A member of the development team will then review the pull request and, when
it's accepted, apply your changes.
If you have any questions about contributing or issues, please contact a member of the development team on IRC: #fedora-modularity on irc.freenode.net
As a general rule, contributions aren't merged into the upstream branch but
applied on top ("rebased"). To make the reviewer's task easy and the review go
as smooth as possible, please rebase your branch on top of the upstream branch
it is based on (usually master
) every now and then while you are developing
your contribution and also when you submit the pull request and while it is
reviewed. This is very appreciated as it ensures that your contribution applies
cleanly always. Thanks!
For our Python code base, regarding coding style we largely follow PEP 8 with a maximum line length of 100 characters for code (please wrap doc strings and comments at a "traditional" 72 characters regardless).
We make an exception regarding import order if a specific version or range of a
module is required (e.g. for placing calls to gi.require_version()
or
pkg_resources.require()
before the respective import
statements). Please
add a noqa comment so that flake8
doesn't flag them:
import gi gi.require_version('Modulemd', '1.0') # noqa: E402 from gi.repository import Modulemd
Please ensure that all commits you submit in a pull request conform to the coding style outlined above and pass the test suite. If you fix such issues introduced by one PR commit in a later one, we prefer that they are merged by using git interactive rebase.
When reviewing, we run the flake8
tool (with the flake8-import-order
plugin which is its own package) and the test suite on all submitted commits.
We recommend doing likewise before submitting a PR to make the process as
smooth as possible:
$ git rebase master --exec flake8 $ git rebase master --exec pytest
Either of these commands will stop the rebase process if it encounters problems to allow fixing it.
If you have problems with this, get in touch (see above) so we can help you with it.
The preferred dependency management tool for development is pipenv
:
$ pipenv --three --site-packages $ PIP_IGNORE_INSTALLED=1 pipenv install --dev
The PIP_IGNORE_INSTALLED=1
setting means that everything available to pip
will be installed into the virtual environment based on Pipfile.lock
, and only
components that aren't installable with pip
will be used from the system
Python installation.
Some dependencies aren't currently available from PyPI, and hence need to be installed system-wide:
$ sudo dnf install libmodulemd python3-gobject-base python3-solv
pipenv
itself isn't packaged for Fedora yet, so the recommended bootstrapping
approach is to use the "pip script installer", pipsi
:
$ sudo dnf install pipsi $ pipsi install pew $ pipsi install pipenv
This will create a pair of isolated virtual environments in your home directory
specifically for pipenv
and the tool it uses for virtual environment
management, pew
. These can later be updated to newer versions using pipsi
:
$ pipsi upgrade pew $ pipsi upgrade pipenv
(Note: the pipsi list
command will list all packages installed via pipsi
,
and the commands they provide)
After setting up the pipenv
environment, the development version can be
run as follows
$ pipenv run fedmod fetch-metadata $ pipenv run fedmod rpm2module graphite-web
Alternatively, start an interactive shell as described below for running the
tests, and fedmod
will refer to the development version.
After going through the environment setup steps above, start a shell that's
correctly configured to run the tests with fedmod
and all of its
dependencies available:
$ pipenv shell
The metadata needed by the module generator tests can then be installed with
fedmod
itself:
$ fedmod fetch-metadata
The tests can then be run in the launched subshell with:
$ pytest tests
To test the package build process, tox is also supported:
$ tox -e py36
To see the Python level dependencies graph:
$ pew toggleglobalsitepackages $ pipenv graph $ pew toggleglobalsitepackages
(If you don't turn off global site-packages access first, you'll get the dependency graph of all the installed system Python components as well)
While the default development environment is managed with pipenv
for a more
consistent cross-platform development experience, fedmod
is intended to
support installation as a system package in Fedora 26 and later.
A specific tox environment is provided to enable this testing:
$ tox -e system
The only component this installs into the environment is fedmod
itself: all
other dependencies must be available as Python 3 system packages.
Unlike the regular test environment, this environment also implicitly runs
fedmod fetch-metadata
in order to ensure that the metadata fetching operation
also works correctly given only system packages as dependencies.
fedmod
's RPMs are built with tito
, but version tagging is handled with a
helper script. To publish a new release, run:
$ ./tag-release.sh <X.Y.Z> $ git push && git push --tags
fedmod
is also published to PyPI here: https://pypi.org/project/fedmod/
After releasing to COPR to ensure everything is properly tagged, a new PyPI release can be made by doing:
$ rm dist/* $ python setup.py sdist bdist_wheel $ twine upload dist/*
The dnf
and solv
dependencies unfortunately mean the PyPI release isn't
particularly useful at this point (pipsi
doesn't allow system level
dependencies).