CC @sinnykumari

we've discussed this with ryan lerch recently at the fedora infra hackfest. He is going to work on this issue.

@dustymabe can you figure out what we should do? i.e. AtomicWorkstation was requested to be on the Workstation page, not in some Atomic section. We need an official and already discussed request, our pagure is not the place where to discuss what should be where (thinking of other tickets filed today).
I hope y'all understand what I mean. Thanks.

@dustymabe can you figure out what we should do? i.e. AtomicWorkstation was requested to be on the Workstation page, not in some Atomic section. We need an official and already discussed request, our pagure is not the place where to discuss what should be where (thinking of other tickets filed today).
I hope y'all understand what I mean. Thanks.

hey @robyduck - for this specific request (this ticket) we have it handled over in https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/389. Expect a PR sometime in the next month.

For Atomic Workstation, those are mostly requests coming the workstation working group. I can't really answer for those but I would agree that having Atomic Workstation on the Workstation page makes sense.

Did I answer all of your questions?

@dustymabe yes, thank you very much ;)
But you see there is difference from having a "should be..." and "we discussed it here and want it like that". (PRs are even better :))))

@ryanlerch By any chance you got some time to work on this ticket or planning to work on it soon?
Meanwhile, I have started working on updating atomic.twoweek fedmsg with multi-arch content, which can be used to show image details for multi-arch on website - https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/392

Also related: issue #838

OKies, just added PR#846 that covers the downloads page items:

https://getfedora.org/en_GB/atomic/download/ now contains download link for multi-arches