Some of the information in the report (which module a package comes from, whether we need to build it) is related to the source package, and some of the information in the report (whether it's in a runtime, whether it appears to be spuriously in the runtime, etc.) is related to the binary package. Showing source packages separated from binary packages could clarify things quite a bit:
instead of showing
enchant - * - * * - installer enchant-devel - - - * * - installer
Show:
enchant installer enchant - * - * * - enchant-devel - - - * * -
it will also group the cases where subpackages don't share a common prefix.
Metadata Update from @otaylor: - Issue tagged with: reports
Login to comment on this ticket.