epel

Clone
Source Code
GIT

#189 Added admonition to improve clarity of package request.
Merged 2 years ago by carlwgeorge. Opened 2 years ago by rcallicotte.
rcallicotte/epel main  into  main

file modified
+5 -1 
@@ -16,14 +16,18 @@ 
 

  If there are no requests, then you should open a bug on Bugzilla requesting the
 

  package.  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi
 

  

+ [NOTE]
 

+ .Bugzilla Info
 

+ ====
 

  * Classification : Fedora
 

  * Product : "Fedora EPEL"
 

  * Component : <package>
 

- ** If <package> isn't found in Component, the go back and change the Product to "Fedora"
 

+ ** If <package> isn't found in Component, then go back and change the Product to "Fedora"
 

  ** If <package> isn't found in Component under "Fedora EPEL" or "Fedora" Products, it should be added to Fedora first
 

  * Version : epel9 (or whatever epel version you want it it)
 

  ** If using Product "Fedora" select Version : rawhide
 

  * Summary : Please branch and build <package> in epel9
 

+ ====
 

  

  At this point, things change depending on your ability or willingness to help.

Added simple admonition to clarify which info should be included in bugzilla ticket.

I like this idea. My only concern is calling it a "TIP" makes it sound like it's optional. Can we use the "NOTE" admonition type instead?

https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/blocks/admonitions/

1 new commit added

  • Changed admonition to 'NOTE' type
2 years ago

I made the change. I agree, NOTE fits this idea better.

Pull-Request has been merged by carlwgeorge
2 years ago

Wow, such a little change makes it look so much better.
Thank you very much.
Metadata
None
No Tags
Changes Summary 1
+5 -1
file changed
modules/ROOT/pages/epel-package-request.adoc
Powered by Pagure 5.13.3
Documentation • File an Issue • About • SSH Hostkey/Fingerprint
© Red Hat, Inc. and others.