| |
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
|
| |
|
| |
If you do not wish to maintain <package> in epel9,
|
| |
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
|
| |
- I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package.
|
| |
+ I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS <your FAS Id>).
|
| |
....
|
| |
|
| |
If there is no response after a week, add the following comment in the bug.
|
| |
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
|
| |
....
|
| |
Will you be able to branch and build <package> in epel9?
|
| |
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish
|
| |
- to build it on epel9.
|
| |
+ to build it on epel9 (FAS <your FAS Id>).
|
| |
....
|
| |
|
| |
If there is no action on the bug after another week, follow the xref:epel-policy#stalled_epel_requests[Stalled EPEL Request steps], and open a ticket with https://pagure.io/releng/issues/[releng]
|
| |
carlwgeorge
commented 2 years ago
This avoids the existing maintainer having to look up the ID or guess at the correct one.