#361 Badge Request: Fedora Atomic
Opened 3 years ago by jzb. Modified 3 months ago

A lot of folks have contributed work to enable the Fedora Atomic Host from the Fedora Cloud edition. I'd like to have a badge that we can award to people who've made contributions that have helped make it happen and work on continued improvement.

I'm thinking something like "Atomizer" or "Fedora Atomic Scientist" -- would like to stay away from any "splitting the atom" metaphors. :-) I can provide SVGs of the Project Atomic logo if that would be helpful.


@jzb, providing the svgs of the logo would be very helpful, thank you.

@jzb, providing the svgs of the logo would be very helpful, thank you.

Concept: Atomic logo resting in the clouds (without black bg)

Concept: Atomic logo resting in the clouds (without black bg)

Replying to [comment:2 riecatnor]:

Concept: Atomic logo resting in the clouds (without black bg)

Maybe the Atomic logo is on a beaker below the cloud (i.e. ''creating'' the cloud). Would love to tackle this (I'm new here).

Replying to [comment:2 riecatnor]:

Concept: Atomic logo resting in the clouds (without black bg)

Maybe the Atomic logo is on a beaker below the cloud (i.e. ''creating'' the cloud). Would love to tackle this (I'm new here).

Hey! great start :)

The concept works, the artwork just needs a little work to meet the badge guidelines. Make your beaker a bit more stylized. Take out the bubbles, and little lines. Make the stroke thicker, at least 1.5 but probably closer to 3. Examples: http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/di7/o86/di7o86MkT.svg http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/MTL/RKr/MTLRKrGTa.png

Try making the bottom of the beaker a little bit less wide, so you can center it more.

Thanks!!

Hey! great start :)

The concept works, the artwork just needs a little work to meet the badge guidelines. Make your beaker a bit more stylized. Take out the bubbles, and little lines. Make the stroke thicker, at least 1.5 but probably closer to 3. Examples: http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/di7/o86/di7o86MkT.svg http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/MTL/RKr/MTLRKrGTa.png

Try making the bottom of the beaker a little bit less wide, so you can center it more.

Thanks!!

Discussed in [https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-11-02/fedora_badges.2016-11-02-11.05.html 2016-10-03 meeting].

I'm curious, is there any way that we're able to automate the awarding of this badge? Repos on Pagure, places that people are sending code?

Also triaging ticket further.

Discussed in [https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-11-02/fedora_badges.2016-11-02-11.05.html 2016-10-03 meeting].

I'm curious, is there any way that we're able to automate the awarding of this badge? Repos on Pagure, places that people are sending code?

Also triaging ticket further.

Thanks, riecatnor. This was part of a sprint to get involved. I'll make some modifications.

jflory7: Looking forward to your writeup w/ mairin on riot.fm (https://twitter.com/mairin/status/793804744552804356)

Both -- any advice on getting started contributing would be helpful. I'm probably misunderstanding the process or timelines for Fedora Magazine images, but that seems to have not worked out yet either (https://pagure.io/fedoramagazine-images/issue/27)

Thanks, riecatnor. This was part of a sprint to get involved. I'll make some modifications.

jflory7: Looking forward to your writeup w/ mairin on riot.fm (https://twitter.com/mairin/status/793804744552804356)

Both -- any advice on getting started contributing would be helpful. I'm probably misunderstanding the process or timelines for Fedora Magazine images, but that seems to have not worked out yet either (https://pagure.io/fedoramagazine-images/issue/27)

Here's an update!

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-badge-draft.2.png)]]

Replying to [comment:6 riecatnor]:

Hey! great start :)

The concept works, the artwork just needs a little work to meet the badge guidelines. Make your beaker a bit more stylized. Take out the bubbles, and little lines. Make the stroke thicker, at least 1.5 but probably closer to 3. Examples: http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/di7/o86/di7o86MkT.svg http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/MTL/RKr/MTLRKrGTa.png

Try making the bottom of the beaker a little bit less wide, so you can center it more.

Thanks!!

Here's an update!

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-badge-draft.2.png)]]

Replying to [comment:6 riecatnor]:

Hey! great start :)

The concept works, the artwork just needs a little work to meet the badge guidelines. Make your beaker a bit more stylized. Take out the bubbles, and little lines. Make the stroke thicker, at least 1.5 but probably closer to 3. Examples: http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/di7/o86/di7o86MkT.svg http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/MTL/RKr/MTLRKrGTa.png

Try making the bottom of the beaker a little bit less wide, so you can center it more.

Thanks!!

Artwork looks nice to me, but it will be better for a design team member to give an official sign-off on the artwork. :)

The question I think needs answering is how this badge will be awarded. If it's manually awarded to a few folks, that's not a problem, but if we want this to be a long-term sort of badge, we should definitely try to find a way to automate this.

Artwork looks nice to me, but it will be better for a design team member to give an official sign-off on the artwork. :)

The question I think needs answering is how this badge will be awarded. If it's manually awarded to a few folks, that's not a problem, but if we want this to be a long-term sort of badge, we should definitely try to find a way to automate this.

Replying to [comment:10 jflory7]:

Artwork looks nice to me, but it will be better for a design team member to give an official sign-off on the artwork. :)

The question I think needs answering is how this badge will be awarded. If it's manually awarded to a few folks, that's not a problem, but if we want this to be a long-term sort of badge, we should definitely try to find a way to automate this.

Thanks. For my benefit: what is the "this" that can be automated with respect to badges.

Replying to [comment:10 jflory7]:

Artwork looks nice to me, but it will be better for a design team member to give an official sign-off on the artwork. :)

The question I think needs answering is how this badge will be awarded. If it's manually awarded to a few folks, that's not a problem, but if we want this to be a long-term sort of badge, we should definitely try to find a way to automate this.

Thanks. For my benefit: what is the "this" that can be automated with respect to badges.

Hi Kyle! A few more tweaks for the artwork:

  • The badge shape isn't really square so when you center stuff in it, you kind of gotta nudge it down a bit and left a bit so it looks "centered." Might want to try that with the beaker?

  • Is the background supposed to be clouds? It didn't read to me and from the backlog it looks like that was the intention? I like the idea of the beaker in the clouds or spouting clouds but I think they should probably be drawn and in the foreground.

  • I would make the atomic logo bigger - scale down the measurement hashes on the right and scale the logo up as much as you can. The badges are often displayed at half the size and I'm worried the logo won't read at all at 50% (and it being an atomic badge I think we want the logo to be the main element that stands out.)

  • Might want to go with a flat grey (or even dark grey) gradient in the background - go darker and then the clouds you add will pop more?

Just some ideas.

Hi Kyle! A few more tweaks for the artwork:

  • The badge shape isn't really square so when you center stuff in it, you kind of gotta nudge it down a bit and left a bit so it looks "centered." Might want to try that with the beaker?

  • Is the background supposed to be clouds? It didn't read to me and from the backlog it looks like that was the intention? I like the idea of the beaker in the clouds or spouting clouds but I think they should probably be drawn and in the foreground.

  • I would make the atomic logo bigger - scale down the measurement hashes on the right and scale the logo up as much as you can. The badges are often displayed at half the size and I'm worried the logo won't read at all at 50% (and it being an atomic badge I think we want the logo to be the main element that stands out.)

  • Might want to go with a flat grey (or even dark grey) gradient in the background - go darker and then the clouds you add will pop more?

Just some ideas.

Thanks for the feedback. I played around a bit and--due to the size--worry about being able to get each element legible (cloud and beaker) in a final image.

In each, I've reprioritied the logo size and position and mostly downplayed or removed the beaker.

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-play.png)]]

The final image is my favorite--contributions pushing through the clouds--though it's lost parts of the original idea.

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-better-2016-11-15.png)]]

All feedback welcome.

Thanks for the feedback. I played around a bit and--due to the size--worry about being able to get each element legible (cloud and beaker) in a final image.

In each, I've reprioritied the logo size and position and mostly downplayed or removed the beaker.

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-play.png)]]

The final image is my favorite--contributions pushing through the clouds--though it's lost parts of the original idea.

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-better-2016-11-15.png)]]

All feedback welcome.

Hey Kyle!

So in terms of what most closely matches the badge style, the second and third from the left do. But I do like your favorite, just a few more small tweaks I think to get it to match the style:

  • The thick outlines around objects is sort of a hallmark of the fedora badges style. What I'd suggest is a thick white gray outline around the cloud, and have the dashed outline on top (and thicken it so it's the same thickness) so you get the idea of it being dashed without losing the badge style.

  • I think the lines of the arrows should be thicker.

  • The negative space on the bottom right is a little off... i think the arrow head placement of the bottom center arrow might be a bit off too. What i'd suggest is swapping the bottom center and bottom right arrows, and maybe adding some more (could be at 50% transparency so they drop to the background) in that lower right area so the negative space doesn't seem to be a big hole.

  • I would push the cloud down a little bit and scale it and the atomic logo up as much as possible while maintaining space for the arrows. (this is the same concern about the atomic logo being readable.)

  • You might want to up the contrast between the cloud white and the grey background. Just a smidge. They are a little too low contrast right now adn i'm worried at smaller sizes it'll just all look the same gray.

Hope this helps!

Hey Kyle!

So in terms of what most closely matches the badge style, the second and third from the left do. But I do like your favorite, just a few more small tweaks I think to get it to match the style:

  • The thick outlines around objects is sort of a hallmark of the fedora badges style. What I'd suggest is a thick white gray outline around the cloud, and have the dashed outline on top (and thicken it so it's the same thickness) so you get the idea of it being dashed without losing the badge style.

  • I think the lines of the arrows should be thicker.

  • The negative space on the bottom right is a little off... i think the arrow head placement of the bottom center arrow might be a bit off too. What i'd suggest is swapping the bottom center and bottom right arrows, and maybe adding some more (could be at 50% transparency so they drop to the background) in that lower right area so the negative space doesn't seem to be a big hole.

  • I would push the cloud down a little bit and scale it and the atomic logo up as much as possible while maintaining space for the arrows. (this is the same concern about the atomic logo being readable.)

  • You might want to up the contrast between the cloud white and the grey background. Just a smidge. They are a little too low contrast right now adn i'm worried at smaller sizes it'll just all look the same gray.

Hope this helps!

Thanks for the feedback! Something like this?

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-draft-2016-11-23.png)]]

The green seemed to fight a slightly lighter gray, so I went darker.

Things I'm uncertain of:

  1. Arrow placement
  2. Dark background
  3. Rounded arrows

The logo is more prominent though, and this reads better at a smaller size.

Open to more feedback―helpful so far!

Thanks for the feedback! Something like this?

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-draft-2016-11-23.png)]]

The green seemed to fight a slightly lighter gray, so I went darker.

Things I'm uncertain of:

  1. Arrow placement
  2. Dark background
  3. Rounded arrows

The logo is more prominent though, and this reads better at a smaller size.

Open to more feedback―helpful so far!

This looks pretty awesome to me! I like where this badge is going, but I am also a little concerned that it won't be possible to implement this one easily. I'm not sure is jzb meant to have it awarded on an ad-hoc basis or if this is supposed to be automated somehow. I will try to get a Cloud WG member to comment here with some feedback.

This looks pretty awesome to me! I like where this badge is going, but I am also a little concerned that it won't be possible to implement this one easily. I'm not sure is jzb meant to have it awarded on an ad-hoc basis or if this is supposed to be automated somehow. I will try to get a Cloud WG member to comment here with some feedback.

Replying to [comment:16 jflory7]:

This looks pretty awesome to me! I like where this badge is going, but I am also a little concerned that it won't be possible to implement this one easily. I'm not sure is jzb meant to have it awarded on an ad-hoc basis or if this is supposed to be automated somehow. I will try to get a Cloud WG member to comment here with some feedback.

Sure -- let me know if there's anything to be done in the meantime. Thanks.

Replying to [comment:16 jflory7]:

This looks pretty awesome to me! I like where this badge is going, but I am also a little concerned that it won't be possible to implement this one easily. I'm not sure is jzb meant to have it awarded on an ad-hoc basis or if this is supposed to be automated somehow. I will try to get a Cloud WG member to comment here with some feedback.

Sure -- let me know if there's anything to be done in the meantime. Thanks.

IMO, This cannot be automated and needs to be awarded manually. We can give the authorization to the Atomic WG members.

IMO, This cannot be automated and needs to be awarded manually. We can give the authorization to the Atomic WG members.

Hi Kyle!

This looks pretty good! I like the upward and forward movement the artwork projects. We reviewed your design in the badges meeting today and came up with a couple suggestions:
- there seems to be no need for transparencies. How would you feel about getting rid of them?
- the dark grey bg is not something we have in our badges guidelines. Riecatnor and I suggest blue - it makes sense for a cloud to be in the sky, doesn't it?
- what is the black dotted outline? Does it stand for something?

Thanks! Would love to see those changes made!

Hi Kyle!

This looks pretty good! I like the upward and forward movement the artwork projects. We reviewed your design in the badges meeting today and came up with a couple suggestions:
- there seems to be no need for transparencies. How would you feel about getting rid of them?
- the dark grey bg is not something we have in our badges guidelines. Riecatnor and I suggest blue - it makes sense for a cloud to be in the sky, doesn't it?
- what is the black dotted outline? Does it stand for something?

Thanks! Would love to see those changes made!

Thanks, mleonova. How's this? Had to change the color of the arrows I think. Looks better.

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-blue.png)]]

Thanks, mleonova. How's this? Had to change the color of the arrows I think. Looks better.

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-blue.png)]]

Hi Kyle!

We've reviewed your badge with @riecatnor - and you're definitely on the right track, almost finished! Let's make a couple more changes:
- thicken the cloud outline and make it the same grey as the logo.
- change the background to lighter blue. perhaps something like this: https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/building-the-outer-ring-copr-build-iv. Lt's see how those arrows look on it.

Thanks!

Hi Kyle!

We've reviewed your badge with @riecatnor - and you're definitely on the right track, almost finished! Let's make a couple more changes:
- thicken the cloud outline and make it the same grey as the logo.
- change the background to lighter blue. perhaps something like this: https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/building-the-outer-ring-copr-build-iv. Lt's see how those arrows look on it.

Thanks!

Hi Kyle!

That looks great! I actually do like the gradient - maybe just shift it a bit for more contrast?
One thing I'm concerned about is png size - they look twice as big as they should. Just make sure when uploading final version that png is 256x256 px. Thanks! =)

Replying to [comment:22 kylerconway]:

Thanks @mleonova and @riecatnor. Changes below. Two versions:

Gradient (but arrows lose contrast):

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/tx361.png)]]

Hi Kyle!

That looks great! I actually do like the gradient - maybe just shift it a bit for more contrast?
One thing I'm concerned about is png size - they look twice as big as they should. Just make sure when uploading final version that png is 256x256 px. Thanks! =)

Replying to [comment:22 kylerconway]:

Thanks @mleonova and @riecatnor. Changes below. Two versions:

Gradient (but arrows lose contrast):

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/tx361.png)]]

How's this? (Should be the right size). Question: are the final svg's housed anywhere or is the png the only living format?

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-badge-db.png)]]

Thanks!

Replying to [comment:23 mleonova]:

Hi Kyle!

That looks great! I actually do like the gradient - maybe just shift it a bit for more contrast?
One thing I'm concerned about is png size - they look twice as big as they should. Just make sure when uploading final version that png is 256x256 px. Thanks! =)

Replying to [comment:22 kylerconway]:

Thanks @mleonova and @riecatnor. Changes below. Two versions:

Gradient (but arrows lose contrast):

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/tx361.png)]]

How's this? (Should be the right size). Question: are the final svg's housed anywhere or is the png the only living format?

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-badge-db.png)]]

Thanks!

Replying to [comment:23 mleonova]:

Hi Kyle!

That looks great! I actually do like the gradient - maybe just shift it a bit for more contrast?
One thing I'm concerned about is png size - they look twice as big as they should. Just make sure when uploading final version that png is 256x256 px. Thanks! =)

Replying to [comment:22 kylerconway]:

Thanks @mleonova and @riecatnor. Changes below. Two versions:

Gradient (but arrows lose contrast):

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/tx361.png)]]

Hi Kyle! This looks great to me! I'll set it to approved. Please upload the svg here.

Replying to [comment:24 kylerconway]:

How's this? (Should be the right size). Question: are the final svg's housed anywhere or is the png the only living format?

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-badge-db.png)]]

Thanks!

Hi Kyle! This looks great to me! I'll set it to approved. Please upload the svg here.

Replying to [comment:24 kylerconway]:

How's this? (Should be the right size). Question: are the final svg's housed anywhere or is the png the only living format?

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-badge-db.png)]]

Thanks!

Uploaded. Thanks for the feedback and assistance along the way everyone.

Replying to [comment:25 mleonova]:

Hi Kyle! This looks great to me! I'll set it to approved. Please upload the svg here.

Replying to [comment:24 kylerconway]:

How's this? (Should be the right size). Question: are the final svg's housed anywhere or is the png the only living format?

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-badge-db.png)]]

Thanks!

Uploaded. Thanks for the feedback and assistance along the way everyone.

Replying to [comment:25 mleonova]:

Hi Kyle! This looks great to me! I'll set it to approved. Please upload the svg here.

Replying to [comment:24 kylerconway]:

How's this? (Should be the right size). Question: are the final svg's housed anywhere or is the png the only living format?

[[Image(https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/raw-attachment/ticket/361/atomic-badge-db.png)]]

Thanks!

Thank you, that looks great! Let's get someone to push it.

Replying to [comment:27 kylerconway]:

Uploaded. Thanks for the feedback and assistance along the way everyone.

Thank you, that looks great! Let's get someone to push it.

Replying to [comment:27 kylerconway]:

Uploaded. Thanks for the feedback and assistance along the way everyone.

Metadata Update from @jzb:
- Issue assigned to kylerconway

2 years ago

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field artwork adjusted to None
- Custom field concept_review_passed adjusted to None (was: 0)
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from None)
- Custom field has_description reset (from 0)
- Custom field has_name reset (from 0)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from 0)
- Custom field triaged adjusted to on (was: 1)
- Issue close_status updated to: None
- Issue tagged with: artwork-approved, development

a year ago

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field artwork adjusted to approved (was: None)
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field has_name reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

a year ago

@jzb can you provide a description and a title to the badge?

And would this be a automatic badge to now created atomic-wg FAS group members or you want to award to the persons who helped with migration from Fedora Cloud to Fedora Atomic Host?

Metadata Update from @sayanchowdhury:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field has_name reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

a year ago

@jzb can you provide a description and a title to the badge?

I'll try:

Title: "Fedora Atomic Scientist"
Description: "Enabled fixing or delivering a feature in Fedora Atomic Host"

And would this be a automatic badge to now created atomic-wg FAS group members

no. the atomic-wg FAS group doesn't mean a lot right now. I've been meaning to try to trim the membership down to actual people who need it.

or you want to award to the persons who helped with migration from Fedora Cloud to Fedora Atomic Host?

Can we manually choose who receives the badge at will?

I have other ideas for other badges that could be 'automatic':

  • attended fedora atomic working group meeting
  • opened an issue against fedora atomic working group pagure
  • user was assigned an issue in the fedora atomic working group pagure
  • kubernetes badge: opened an issue in the kubernetes sig issue tracker
  • kubernetes badge: user was assigned an issue in the kubernetes sig issue tracker
  • Fedora Cloud badge: opened an issue in the cloud sig issue tracker
  • Fedora Cloud badge: user was assigned an issue in the cloud sig issue tracker

going to set this one to "ready to push"!

@dustymabe all great ideas! please open new issues for each one you want to see created. thanks!

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field has_name reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

3 months ago

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field has_name reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)
- Issue tagged with: ready to push

3 months ago

going to set this one to "ready to push"!

does that mean these badges exist now? If yes, how do we wire them up so they get automatically assigned?

@dustymabe all great ideas! please open new issues for each one you want to see created. thanks!

thanks :)

going to set this one to "ready to push"!

does that mean these badges exist now? If yes, how do we wire them up so they get automatically assigned?

We can either push them so they can be awarded manually or automatically. If they are going to be awarded automatically we need yaml files that describe the fedmesg triggers for awarding them.

Also, what is the ongoing status of atomic as a name? I thought it was changing? @sanja

Metadata Update from @bex:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field has_name reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

3 months ago

We can either push them so they can be awarded manually or automatically. If they are going to be awarded automatically we need yaml files that describe the fedmesg triggers for awarding them.

can it look at historical data for atomic? would like to give out badges for people who have contributed in the past

Also, what is the ongoing status of atomic as a name? I thought it was changing? @sanja

we'll file new tickets for coreos

@bex It is changing, atomic shouldn't be used anymore - if @dustymabe wants to have a badge for past contributors to Atomic, that's fine with me.

@bex It is changing, atomic shouldn't be used anymore - if @dustymabe wants to have a badge for past contributors to Atomic, that's fine with me.

In this case the atomic badges should be manually awarded to the list @dustymabe generates. There is currently no lookback automation (PRs accepted).

Metadata Update from @bex:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field has_name reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

3 months ago

In this case the atomic badges should be manually awarded to the list @dustymabe generates. There is currently no lookback automation (PRs accepted).

that's fine.. but for cloud-sig and kubernetes badges those can be automated IMHO. How do we set that up?

In this case the atomic badges should be manually awarded to the list @dustymabe generates. There is currently no lookback automation (PRs accepted).

that's fine.. but for cloud-sig and kubernetes badges those can be automated IMHO. How do we set that up?

It's done with yaml rules. Ideally you can join this and working on it: https://flock2018.sched.com/event/Fje7/how-to-become-a-fedora-badges-sysadmin-superstar (and part 2)

Metadata Update from @bex:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field has_name reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

3 months ago

This has been long stalled. Can someone please confirm the following info?

  • Title: "Fedora Atomic Scientist"
  • Description: "Enabled fixing or delivering a feature in Fedora Atomic Host"
  • Artwork: (can somebody recover the links or reupload?, the current one don't work)
  • Category: development

The badge should be manually awarded by all Atomic WG members (note that Badges only support users AFAIK, so I can do this for a group manually but it won't automatically update with new group memebrs).

Metadata Update from @churchyard:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field has_name reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)
- Issue untagged with: ready to push

3 months ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata
Attachments 22
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment
Attached 2 years ago View Comment