As the author of rpkg utility, I am ok with the current state of things. The upstream rpkg lib repo (this repo) should be in my opinion really called 'rpkg' as the upstream for the 'rpkg' python module.

At src.fp.o it is questionable. Actually, I would keep it called 'rpkg' there as well because in an ideal case the rpkg upstream would be placed directly at src.fp.o (regrettably, src.fp.o does not allow work with expanded sources at the moment).

Just saying that the current state is alright in my opinion and I don't think any action is really needed to be taken here.

Of course, if there are other reasons for the rename...