#8504 unable to push fixes to python-ttystatus package
Closed: Fixed 3 years ago by kevin. Opened 4 years ago by filiperosset.

I'm trying to fix some broken packages, but I'm stuck with python-ttystatus, I cannot commit my changes to fix FTBFS:

[filiperosset@raw python-ttystatus]$ git push
Enter passphrase for key '/home/filiperosset/.ssh/id_rsa':
Enumerating objects: 5, done.
Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 502 bytes | 502.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 3 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: Branch refs/heads/master is unsupported
remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/master' for user 'filiperosset'
remote: All changes have been rejected
To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ttystatus
! [remote rejected] master -> master (pre-receive hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://filiperosset@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ttystatus'
[filiperosset@raw python-ttystatus]$


@filiperosset So, two things:

  1. It was accidentally retired by @salimma - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8102, I am not sure what salimma wants to do here.

  2. You dont own the package, so, if you are interested in maintaining it, please request salimma to add you as co-maintainer and we can unretire the package for you.

@filiperosset @mohanboddu I'll be happy to add Filipe as a co-maintainer. But unless someone wants to actively use python-ttystatus, I'm of the opinion we should retire it, and the whole stack (anything that Obnam depends on). Upstream (Lars Wirzenius) stopped working on it a while ago, and I'm not sure there's a point in porting them to support Python 3.

Didn't get around to retiring the other packages yet, what do people think? I'll announce in devel@ before doing that (with a list of packages) just in case.

@filiperosset @mohanboddu I'll be happy to add Filipe as a co-maintainer. But unless someone wants to actively use python-ttystatus, I'm of the opinion we should retire it, and the whole stack (anything that Obnam depends on). Upstream (Lars Wirzenius) stopped working on it a while ago, and I'm not sure there's a point in porting them to support Python 3.
Didn't get around to retiring the other packages yet, what do people think? I'll announce in devel@ before doing that (with a list of packages) just in case.

Based on this, I think its better to retire it, but if Filipe wants to maintain it, I can make the changes and he needs to be added as co-maintainer.

@filiperosset , the recommendation is to retire this package since it does not support python 3. Are you okay with this plan?

I don't see a need for releng to be involved here. ;)

@filiperosset feel free to contact @salimma if you want to co-maintain.

Metadata Update from @kevin:
- Issue close_status updated to: Fixed
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

3 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata