[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DDT2GYGOTQGW4HCRE62QKB5GSGL75HMG/
@sergiomb Since ladspa-swh-plugins is retired for more than 2 weeks it needs a re-review.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
Could you please request for a re-review and give us the BZ url and we can unretire it for you.
Thanks.
I propose change the rule for 3 months at least , where I do this new request ? Please help me , I'm complete overbooked
@sergiomb You can request FESCo for the change.
You can file a ticket at https://pagure.io/fesco/issues
I forgot to mention only need un-retire master , other branches still active
giving up Thanks
Metadata Update from @sergiomb: - Issue close_status updated to: It's all good - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
@sergiomb Sorry, I didn't see your following message.
Anyway, unretirement is only possible with a re-review for ladspa-swh-plugins package. And the policy got changed to 8 weeks, so its not bad.
Please reopen the ticket if you still want to maintain it, but do remember it requires a re-review.
For now I don't wan unretire this package, I just forgot close ticket earlier. Thanks
Log in to comment on this ticket.