#8120 unretire ladspa-swh-plugins
Closed: It's all good 4 years ago by sergiomb. Opened 5 years ago by sergiomb.

  • Describe the issue
    Someone in 2016-06 orphan ladspa-swh-plugins [1]

[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DDT2GYGOTQGW4HCRE62QKB5GSGL75HMG/

  • If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
  • nothing provides ladspa-swh-plugins needed by flowblade-2.0-1.fc30.noarch

@sergiomb Since ladspa-swh-plugins is retired for more than 2 weeks it needs a re-review.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package

Could you please request for a re-review and give us the BZ url and we can unretire it for you.

Thanks.

I propose change the rule for 3 months at least , where I do this new request ?
Please help me , I'm complete overbooked

@sergiomb You can request FESCo for the change.

You can file a ticket at https://pagure.io/fesco/issues

I forgot to mention only need un-retire master , other branches still active

Metadata Update from @sergiomb:
- Issue close_status updated to: It's all good
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

4 years ago

@sergiomb Sorry, I didn't see your following message.

I forgot to mention only need un-retire master , other branches still active

Anyway, unretirement is only possible with a re-review for ladspa-swh-plugins package. And the policy got changed to 8 weeks, so its not bad.

Please reopen the ticket if you still want to maintain it, but do remember it requires a re-review.

Thanks.

For now I don't wan unretire this package, I just forgot close ticket earlier. Thanks

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata