#6031 Create Fedora 21 Final test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC)

Created 3 years ago by adamwill
Modified a year ago

It's time - sort of - for 21 Final TC1. Yes, even though Beta isn't quite out yet. Yes, we have laid in extra whisky. The schedule hasn't been updated, but sgallagh's been pushing to do an earlier TC1, QA and releng aren't opposed, and it'll give us a fixed upgrade.img mirrormanager can point at for fedup purposes, so let's just do it.

About that fedup thing, that's the only build we explicitly want to pull in for TC1:

please make sure whatever needs doing to make the tree's upgrade.img images be built with that systemd happen. Thanks!

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_TC1/

armhfp Server repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC1/21_TC1/Server/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 2441
}}}
i386 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC1/21_TC1/Server/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 2474
}}}
x86_64 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC1/21_TC1/Server/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 2469
}}}

armhfp Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC1/21_TC1/Cloud/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 1852
}}}
i386 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC1/21_TC1/Cloud/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 1873
}}}
x86_64 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC1/21_TC1/Cloud/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 1867
}}}

Re-opening for TC2, just on general principles. Please pull:

Thanks!

Can we also make sure that [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-13964/docker-storage-setup-0.0.3-1.fc21 docker-storage-setup] makes it in to the ostree spin so that it ends up on the Fedora Atomic image?

Is this something we're going to want to be on EC2 when it's done, and if so, what's the best way for me to tell when it's ready? Just checking Koji, or...?

Replying to [comment:5 oddshocks]:

Is this something we're going to want to be on EC2 when it's done, and if so, what's the best way for me to tell when it's ready? Just checking Koji, or...?

Yeah, we will -- at least, presuming the Atomic image basically comes out right. (Thanks for checking.) I think maybe in this case the best approach may be that I ping you on IRC?

Replying to [comment:6 mattdm]:

Replying to [comment:5 oddshocks]:

Is this something we're going to want to be on EC2 when it's done, and if so, what's the best way for me to tell when it's ready? Just checking Koji, or...?

Yeah, we will -- at least, presuming the Atomic image basically comes out right. (Thanks for checking.) I think maybe in this case the best approach may be that I ping you on IRC?

That's ''perfect''. Thanks, Matt. :)

Replying to [comment:3 adamwill]:

  • kernel-3.17.2-301.fc21 - there's no update for this yet but I think it'd make sense to pull it in if we can get a hold of a kernel folk to submit an update

We're not going to submit this for an update. 3.17.3 will be released upstream on Friday and that will be the next update we submit. This build was done so that secondary arches can pick up the crypto fix but they don't need anything other than the build to be done.

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_TC2/

armhfp Server repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC2/21_TC2/Server/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 2448
}}}
i386 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC2/21_TC2/Server/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 2481
}}}
x86_64 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC2/21_TC2/Server/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 2476
}}}

armhfp Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC2/21_TC2/Cloud/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 1859
}}}
i386 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC2/21_TC2/Cloud/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 1880
}}}
x86_64 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC2/21_TC2/Cloud/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 1874
}}}

Re-opening for TC3. Please use [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15426/lorax-21.29-1.fc21 lorax-21.29-1.fc21] for the compose, to address FE issue[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165425 #1165425]. Please pull:

== Blocker ==

== Freeze exception ==

Note: we need to be careful with the Koji 'fix' for [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145264 #1145264]. The initial fix appears to have been broken, causing live generation to fail. We need to roll it back or update to the 'new' fix with my adjustments (and, ideally, check that it works with a test run before firing the full compose).

Replying to [comment:10 adamwill]:

Re-opening for TC3. Please use [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15426/lorax-21.29-1.fc21 lorax-21.29-1.fc21] for the compose, to address FE issue[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165425 #1165425]. Please pull:

Any chance to get in the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15269/xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.916-3.20141117.fc21 xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.916-3.20141117.fc21] for proposed blocker [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162068 #1162068]? (It is already in the tree as a fix for blocker [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148493 #1148493] so not sure it has to be explicitly pulled into new TC images.)

Replying to [comment:12 mcsontos]:

Any chance to get in the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15269/xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.916-3.20141117.fc21 xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.916-3.20141117.fc21] for proposed blocker [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162068 #1162068]? (It is already in the tree as a fix for blocker [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148493 #1148493] so not sure it has to be explicitly pulled into new TC images.)

If it's not too late, I believe we should. Even if it didn't solve [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162068 #1162068], it solves [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148493 #1148493], which is not proposed as a blocker yet, but easily could.

It it's still not too late, we also need to include [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-boxes-3.14.2-2.fc21 gnome-boxes-3.14.2-2.fc21] for [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146232 #1146232].

Besides [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594582 gnome-shell-extension-background-logo-3.14.0-1.fc21] for accepted freeze exception [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161637 #1161637], we also need the patch for fedora-release at [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2014-November/018968.html] accepted.

Adding to TC3 request:

Kamil, the xorg-x11-drv-intel update was already pushed stable three days ago and should be included in TC3 without any special action required. For the record, post-freeze we cannot go around using 'discretion' to pull in fixes for bugs that have not yet been accepted as blockers or FEs, they '''must''' be properly accepted before we can pull in fixes, there is no wiggle room on this.

Paul, gnome-shell-extension-background-logo needs to be submitted to Bodhi and the fedora-release change included in a build that is submitted to Bodhi before either or both can be included in a TC. releng does not pull koji builds or random patches into TCs. If folks follow the correct Bodhi and Bugzilla processes in fixing blocker/FE bugs, the builds '''will''' show up in these compose requests, so please make sure those processes are followed.

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_TC3/

armhfp Server repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC3/21_TC3/Server/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 2448
}}}
i386 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC3/21_TC3/Server/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 2481
}}}
x86_64 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC3/21_TC3/Server/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 2476
}}}

armhfp Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC3/21_TC3/Cloud/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 1857
}}}
i386 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC3/21_TC3/Cloud/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 1878
}}}
x86_64 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC3/21_TC3/Cloud/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 1872
}}}

Re-opening for TC4 (I realize it's soon after TC3, but sgallagh wants a build for various significant fixes, and we have a new kernel too). Please compose with [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15627/lorax-21.30-1.fc21 lorax-21.30-1.fc21] to address [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165425 #1165425] and [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155228 #1155228]. Please pull, in addition to the updates listed in previous requests:

== Blocker ==

== Freeze exception ==

Thanks!

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_TC4/

armhfp Server repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC4/21_TC4/Server/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 2448
}}}
i386 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC4/21_TC4/Server/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 2481
}}}
x86_64 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC4/21_TC4/Server/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 2476
}}}

armhfp Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC4/21_TC4/Cloud/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 1857
}}}
i386 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC4/21_TC4/Cloud/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 1878
}}}
x86_64 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_TC4/21_TC4/Cloud/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 1872
}}}

Re-opening for RC1 (yay). [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15627/lorax-21.30-1.fc21 lorax-21.30-1.fc21] has not gone stable yet, so please remember to do whatever you need to do to compose with it. nirik would like to remind you to use latest spin-kickstarts f21 branch HEAD. Please pull, in addition to the packages requested for previous composes:

== Blocker ==

== Freeze exception ==

One more request to go in RC1:

== Freeze exception ==

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_RC1/

armhfp Server repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC1/21/Server/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 2449
}}}
i386 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC1/21/Server/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 2482
}}}
x86_64 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC1/21/Server/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 2477
}}}

armhfp Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC1/21/Cloud/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 1858
}}}
i386 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC1/21/Cloud/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 1879
}}}
x86_64 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC1/21/Cloud/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 1873
}}}

Re-opening for RC2. As always, remember to compose with [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15627/lorax-21.30-1.fc21 lorax-21.30-1.fc21], it's still not pushed stable. Please pull, along with the changes listed for RC1:

== Blocker ==

== FE ==

Note that [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15779/docker-io-1.3.2-2.fc21 docker-io-1.3.2-2.fc21], which was pulled into RC1, has been obsoleted by [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-io-1.3.2-3.git353ff40.fc21 docker-io-1.3.2-3.git353ff40.fc21]. None of the changes in -3 vs. -2 have been approved as FEs, though [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169151 #1169151] does look bad. Strictly according to policy we should stick with -2.

I am choosing not to request the libreport that fixes [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041558 #1041558], although it's on the accepted FE list, because the delta looks a bit big to mess around with now - I'd have been OK with it on Friday, I'm not on Monday.

Modifying RC2 request.

We need to edit the anaconda update to replace pyparted-3.10.2-1.fc21 with pyparted-3.9.5-3.fc21, and update anaconda to anaconda-21.48.21-1.fc21; this is the best way to properly fix blocker [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169019 #1169019] (the initial attempt to fix that in anaconda 21.48.20 turned out to be bad, see the bug report for full details). We then need to make sure RC2 is composed with exactly those versions of anaconda and pyparted (make sure to remove pyparted 3.10 from bleed so it doesn't win over 3.9).

There is now a [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-io-1.3.2-4.fc21 docker-io-1.3.2-4.fc21], which seems to revert some stuff from the -3 build, but is still rather different to the -2 build and I don't have solid enough info on what the point of the changes is and whether -4 is tested to be better than -2 and whether it addresses anything FE-ish. So I think the right thing to do there is stick with -2, and we'll deal with Bodhi later if we wind up shipping RC2.

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_RC2/

armhfp Server repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC2/21/Server/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 2449
}}}
i386 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC2/21/Server/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 2482
}}}
x86_64 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC2/21/Server/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 2477
}}}

armhfp Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC2/21/Cloud/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 1858
}}}
i386 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC2/21/Cloud/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 1879
}}}
x86_64 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC2/21/Cloud/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 1873
}}}

Re-opening for an RC3, solely to improve FE bug:

It does not need any new packages, only a respin of the lives with the latest spin-kickstarts - specifically [https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/commit/?h=f21&id=59e73c16ee88d29d0c0d923bba43c0cdc53d8a01 this commit]. But with dgilmore away it's probably safer to ask releng for a full compose than the somewhat tricky only-respin-the-lives bodge. We can transfer RC2 test results to RC3 as the change here is so isolated, and we still have till Thursday for testing. We can still decide to ship RC2 if we think the font issue isn't so bad and RC3 has problems or we're just not confident in the compose/test process.

So..... this is not a huge deal, but for some reason the RC2 cloud images are named with 2014-11-02 instead of December. (eg. Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-20141102-21.x86_64.qcow2). The contents appear correct, though, and I don't want to court trouble fixing what is probably a typo.

though, and I don't want to court trouble fixing what is probably a typo.

It's fixed in the current run which is running as RC4 (a missing _ caused issues with RC3) and the date used is 20141203

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_RC4/

armhfp Server repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC4/21/Server/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 2449
}}}
i386 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC4/21/Server/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 2482
}}}
x86_64 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC4/21/Server/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 2477
}}}

armhfp Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC4/21/Cloud/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 1858
}}}
i386 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC4/21/Cloud/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 1879
}}}
x86_64 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC4/21/Cloud/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 1873
}}}

Leaving open until sigul is restarted and I can confirm CHECKSUMs and .treeinfo are signed

Hello, sorry for the late notice, but had the chance to try upgrade some systems today. I've encountered this bug on any Gnome desktop system that is running 32 bit libraries:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109477

Can it be included in the blocker bug?

Replying to [comment:32 slaanesh]:

Hello, sorry for the late notice, but had the chance to try upgrade some systems today. I've encountered this bug on any Gnome desktop system that is running 32 bit libraries:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109477

Can it be included in the blocker bug?

This is not at all the place for that. ;)

Please see https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ you can login and propose a bug there or follow the links there to manually proposing.

All the bits are now signed.

Sadly, re-opening for RC5. Please pull the updated:

Specifically: we need python-blivet-0.61.13-1.fc21 included, and we want pyparted-3.9.5-3.fc21 dropped from bleed. The RC5 compose should include anaconda-21.48.21-1.fc21, python-blivet-0.61.13-1.fc21, and pyparted-3.9.5-2.fc21.

There are no other changes compared to RC4.

http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_RC5/

armhfp Server repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC5/21/Server/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 2449
}}}
i386 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC5/21/Server/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 2482
}}}
x86_64 Server repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC5/21/Server/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 2477
}}}

armhfp Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added armhfp repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC5/21/Cloud/armhfp/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
armhfp
Num Packages in Repos: 1858
}}}
i386 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added i386 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC5/21/Cloud/i386/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
i386
Num Packages in Repos: 1879
}}}
x86_64 Cloud repoclosure
{{{
Added x86_64 repo from /srv/pungi/21_RC5/21/Cloud/x86_64/os
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 1
x86_64
Num Packages in Repos: 1873
}}}

Woooo!

I booted the cloud image -- looks good!

RC5 was approved for release on 2014-12-04 Go/No-Go meeting. Please, proceed with release tasks.

I think RC5 checksums still need to be signed?

We released f21. Closing. :)

a year ago

Metadata Update from @adamwill:
- Issue set to the milestone: Fedora 21 Final

Login to comment on this ticket.

cancel