Learn more about these different git repos.
Other Git URLs
aqute-bnd-epel
Since the initial commit was going to basically be based on the aqute-bnd c10s package, I thought I'll skip the git branch creation when requesting the branch.
aqute-bnd
That seems to cause some steps to fail - because they expected some content in the branch? - and after several hours the package is still not tagged correctly for building on EPEL 10
$ koji list-pkgs --tag=epel10.0 --package=aqute-bnd-epel | grep epel10 (no matching packages)
When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) 2024/11/18
When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) N/A
If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? Blocking bringup of antlr in EPEL10 which blocks bringup of the rest of the Golang stack
$ koji list-history --package=aqute-bnd-epel Mon Nov 11 23:15:41 2024 package owner salimma set for aqute-bnd-epel in f42 by bodhi Mon Nov 11 23:15:41 2024 package list entry created: aqute-bnd-epel in f42 by bodhi Mon Nov 11 23:33:40 2024 package owner changed for aqute-bnd-epel in f42 by toddlers/os-control01.iad2.fedoraproject.org [still active] Mon Nov 11 23:33:40 2024 package list entry for aqute-bnd-epel in f42 updated by toddlers/os-control01.iad2.fedoraproject.org [still active] blocked: False -> True Tue Nov 12 10:15:30 2024 package owner salimma set for aqute-bnd-epel in epel10.0 by bodhi [still active] Tue Nov 12 10:15:30 2024 package list entry created: aqute-bnd-epel in epel10.0 by bodhi [still active]
So it looks like it took about ~20min (which is definitely longer than normal), but it did work...
Ideally we should perhaps look at moving the koji pkgadd into the toddler so it all happens at the same time...
Metadata Update from @kevin: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Log in to comment on this ticket.