#12322 Repository for 'pyliblo3' was created, but now we're going to call it python-pyliblo3
Closed: It's all good by patrikp. Opened by adamwill.

  • Describe the issue
    See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307912 . The package initially passed review under the name "pyliblo3" and the repository https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyliblo3 was created, but then @churchyard pointed out that this name is not policy-compliant and the package should be called python-pyliblo3 (among other issues that are still getting worked through). We should probably remove the 'pylibo3' repository.

  • When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
    No specific date.

  • When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
    When we give up on src.fp.o , I guess?

  • If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
    There will be a repository that shouldn't really exist.


In the past, I was told: "retire it". See python3.12. (with the dot at the end).

Metadata Update from @patrikp:
- Issue assigned to patrikp

In the past, I was told: "retire it". See python3.12. (with the dot at the end).

This is correct.
We usually don't delete repositories. Please retire it.

Metadata Update from @patrikp:
- Issue close_status updated to: It's all good
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

Repository has been retired.

Metadata