#1076 Please tag pdns-2.9.21.2-1 for F-10
Closed: Fixed None Opened 15 years ago by ruben.

Could pdns-2.9.21.2-1 be included in F-10? It is a security update for the issue described at http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-announce/2008-November/000096.html

I'm not sure how to move this package from epel-testing to epel, could you do that as well or do I have to report that somewhere else?


+1

EPEL should be reported to the EPEL signers.

You built this for F11, F8, and F9, so I can't tag anything for F10. Odd that you managed to test your build before asking for it tagged when the build doesn't even exist...

Please built for F10 and test, and comment there when it's ready to go.

Sorry, I didn't update my cvs checkout so there was no F-10 branch.

I've just build pdns-2_9_21_2-1_fc10 and tested it locally.

+1

Moving, Tagging, Signing.

Metadata Update from @ruben:
- Issue set to the milestone: Fedora 10 Final

7 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata