#7705 Fedora-eln-20250113.n.2 DOOMED
Closed 2 months ago by jnsamyak. Opened 5 months ago by releng.

pungi.global.log

[ERROR   ] Compose run failed: Runroot task failed: 127838061. See /mnt/koji/compose/eln/Fedora-eln-20250113.n.2/logs/s390x/buildinstall-AppStream.s390x.log for more details.

Compose Total time: 0:10:53
Compose phase INIT time: 0:00:10.
Compose phase PKGSET time: 0:04:27.
Compose phase WEAVER: FAILED.
Compose phase BUILDINSTALL: FAILED.
Compose phase GATHER time: 0:05:06.
Compose phase EXTRA_FILES time: 0:00:04.
Compose phase CREATEREPO time: 0:01:02.


Fallout from the bin-sbin merge:

  - file /usr/sbin/scsi_logging_level conflicts between attempted installs of s390utils-base-2:2.35.0-1.eln144.s390x and sg3_utils-1.48-4.eln144.s390x

cc @sharkcz @zbyszek

Oops. This didn't show up in repoquery because s390utils-base is only available on s390x.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/s390utils/pull-request/14 drops the file.

(I prepped https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sg3_utils/pull-request/7 first, but I think the second pull request is better.)

But s390utils does not build in rawhide (at least in mock). (It builds with a patch.)

@sharkcz Please let me know how you want to proceed. I can push the changes and do the builds myself if you give the green light.

s390utils-base is going to be present on any Z system, where sg3_utils is not part of a base install nor is widely depended upon. The s390utils version uses sysctl where sg3_utils cats from /proc/sys. My guess would be that the s390utils version should be used on s390x, and sg3_utils should exclude it on s390x only (at least for merged bin-sbin), but let's see what Dan says.

I have commented in the PRs.

This is fixed, but see #7714 for a new issue with s390utils.

Metadata Update from @jnsamyak:
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

2 months ago

Log in to comment on this ticket.

Metadata