#5149 Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0 FINISHED_INCOMPLETE
Opened 5 months ago by releng. Modified 5 months ago

pungi.global.log

[ERROR   ] [FAIL] Ostree (variant Sericea, arch aarch64) failed, but going on anyway.
[ERROR   ] Runroot task failed: 102729834. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/aarch64/Sericea/ostree-7/runroot.log for more details.
[ERROR   ] [FAIL] Ostree (variant Sericea, arch ppc64le) failed, but going on anyway.
[ERROR   ] Runroot task failed: 102729843. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/ppc64le/Sericea/ostree-6/runroot.log for more details.
[ERROR   ] [FAIL] Ostree (variant Kinoite, arch ppc64le) failed, but going on anyway.
[ERROR   ] Runroot task failed: 102729836. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/ppc64le/Kinoite/ostree-2/runroot.log for more details.
[ERROR   ] [FAIL] Ostree (variant Silverblue, arch ppc64le) failed, but going on anyway.
[ERROR   ] Runroot task failed: 102729841. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/ppc64le/Silverblue/ostree-9/runroot.log for more details.
[ERROR   ] [FAIL] Ostree (variant Sericea, arch x86_64) failed, but going on anyway.
[ERROR   ] Runroot task failed: 102729839. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/x86_64/Sericea/ostree-5/runroot.log for more details.
[OSTREE_INSTALLER] [ERROR   ] [FAIL] Ostree installer (variant Onyx, arch x86_64) failed, but going on anyway.
[OSTREE_INSTALLER] [ERROR   ] Runroot task failed: 102730870. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/x86_64/Onyx/ostree_installer-4/runroot.log for more details.
[LIVE_MEDIA      ] [ERROR   ] [FAIL] Live media (variant Spins, arch *, subvariant Sway) failed, but going on anyway.
[LIVE_MEDIA      ] [ERROR   ] Live media task failed: 102732484. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/x86_64/livemedia-Spins-Sway.x86_64.log for more details.

Variant: Spins, subvariant: Sway task failed. Pinging maintainers: @alebastr @fale @jkonecny @anthr76

[LIVE_MEDIA      ] [ERROR   ] [FAIL] Live media (variant Spins, arch *, subvariant LXQt) failed, but going on anyway.
[LIVE_MEDIA      ] [ERROR   ] Live media task failed: 102732477. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/aarch64-x86_64/livemedia-Spins-LXQt.aarch64-x86_64.log for more details.

Variant: Spins, subvariant: LXQt task failed. Pinging maintainers: @zsun @lupinix

[IMAGE_BUILD     ] [ERROR   ] [FAIL] Image build (variant Container, arch *, subvariant Container_Toolbox) failed, but going on anyway.
[IMAGE_BUILD     ] [ERROR   ] ImageBuild task failed: 102732488. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/aarch64-ppc64le-s390x-x86_64/imagebuild-Container-Container_Toolbox-docker.aarch64-ppc64le-s390x-x86_64.log for more details.
[IMAGE_BUILD     ] [ERROR   ] [FAIL] Image build (variant Spins, arch *, subvariant LXQt) failed, but going on anyway.
[IMAGE_BUILD     ] [ERROR   ] ImageBuild task failed: 102732581. See /mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0/logs/aarch64/imagebuild-Spins-LXQt-raw-xz.aarch64.log for more details.

Variant: Spins, subvariant: LXQt task failed. Pinging maintainers: @zsun @lupinix

Compose Total time: 4:13:43
Compose phase INIT time: 0:00:26.
Compose phase PKGSET time: 0:20:23.
Compose phase WEAVER: FAILED.
Compose phase BUILDINSTALL time: 1:41:38.
Compose phase GATHER time: 1:47:47.
Compose phase OSTREE time: 0:32:20.
Compose phase OSTREE_INSTALLER time: 1:03:05.
Compose phase CREATEREPO time: 0:07:21.
Compose phase CREATEISO time: 0:08:35.
Compose phase REPOCLOSURE time: 0:01:37.
Compose phase IMAGE_BUILD time: 1:53:00.
Compose phase LIVE_MEDIA time: 1:06:53.
Compose phase IMAGE_CHECKSUM time: 0:03:38.
Compose phase TEST time: 0:00:02.


Toolbox is failing (I marked it non blocking until we actually get it to compose. :)

I also removed @core and @standard from it, because that was causing it to fail because we exclude sssd-client from containers, but this pulls it back in.

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2560/102732560/screenshot.png

it's in the post trying to swap coreutils-single and coreutils-full.

It may be related to dropping core and/or standard.

@rishi any thoughts here?

I have it on my list to take a closer look at the kickstart for the fedora-toolbox image, but I have been getting preempted by other things this past two weeks. So, I don't fully understand the problem with @core and @standard.

Ultimately the goal is to ensure that the image has coreutils-full, because in the past the fedora base image had coreutils-single. These days the base image has switched to coreutils-full, which, I thought, made the dnf swap ... a NOP, and we kept it there to avoid getting surprised by changes in the base image. eg., from the most recent Dockerfile based build of fedora-toolbox:39:

Step 10/24 : RUN dnf -y swap coreutils-single coreutils-full
---> Running in a40049279d1d
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:06 ago on Tue Apr 11 06:21:16 2023.
Package coreutils-9.2-3.fc39.x86_64 is already installed.
No match for argument: coreutils-single
No packages marked for removal.
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!

As a short term fix, you could comment out that dnf swap ... or turn that into a dnf install coreutils-full, depending on whether coreutils-full is already in the image or not. Will that work?

Yeah, so before we were layering on the fedora base image, so you would have to do things like this to remove or swap packages, but now we are just building a base image, but... the fedora base and fedora minimal and toolbox all share a common kickstart, so adjusting things from that is a bit more tricky. We could make it entirely seperate, but then we can't reuse changes.

Anyhow, yeah, the quick fix would be to just drop that swap. I will do that and hopefully we will get something in tomorrow's rawhide.

Hum, there's another swap tho...

Swap glibc-minimal-langpack with glibc-all-langpacks

dnf -y swap glibc-minimal-langpack glibc-all-langpacks

The common container ks has glibc-minimal-languages pulled in.
The toolbox kickstart has both of them excluded?

-glibc-minimal-langpack
-glibc-all-langpacks

I guess the desired state is to have glibc-all-langpacks installed? If so, I will drop the swap and include glibc-all-langpacks...

+1 to have glibc-all-langpacks; I can also check tomorrow's rawhide behaviour, thanks @kevin

Yes, we want glibc-all-langpacks in the fedora-toolbox images.

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata