PR#1398: Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory - pungi-fedora

pungi-fedora

#1398 Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory

Closed 3 months ago by adamwill. Opened 3 months ago by adamwill.

adamwill/pungi-fedora f41-arm-minimal-revert-if into f41

Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory for Final

Adam Williamson • 3 months ago

f20addc

fedora-final.conf

file modified

+13 -14

		`@@ -268,6 +268,19 @@`
		`{`
		`'image-build': {`
		`'format': [('raw-xz','raw.xz')],`
		`+ 'name': 'Fedora-Minimal',`
		`+ 'kickstart': 'fedora-disk-minimal.ks',`
		`+ 'distro': 'Fedora-30',`
		`+ 'disk_size': 6,`
		`+ 'arches': ['aarch64'],`
		`+ 'repo': 'Everything',`
		`+ 'install_tree_from': 'Everything',`
		`+ 'subvariant': 'Minimal',`
		`+ }`
		`+ },`
		`+ {`
		`+ 'image-build': {`
		`+ 'format': [('raw-xz','raw.xz')],`
		`'name': 'Fedora-KDE',`
		`'kickstart': 'fedora-disk-kde.ks',`
		`'distro': 'Fedora-30',`
		`@@ -1026,18 +1039,4 @@`
		`})`
		`]`

		`- osbuild = {`
		`- '^Spins$': [`
		`- {`
		`- 'name': 'Fedora-Minimal',`
		`- 'distro': 'fedora-41',`
		`- 'image_types': ['minimal-raw'],`
		`- 'arches': ['aarch64'],`
		`- 'repo': ['Everything'],`
		`- 'manifest_type': 'raw-xz',`
		`- 'subvariant': 'Minimal',`
		`- }`
		`- ]`
		`- }`
		`-`
		`koji_profile = 'compose_koji'`

adamwill commented 3 months ago

This reverts commit b84b4ee and
makes the same change in fedora-final.conf. osbuild builds are
currently consistently failing due to some kind of issue with
'Unable to start secure instance', and we need to get Fedora 41
Final composes done.

rebased onto f0c3f0b

3 months ago

kevin commented 3 months ago

Yeah. ;(

Hopefully moving back to IF for that image will not result in problems, we can compare the resulting new IF image with the last osbuild one and see if there are any unexpected differences.

Lets leave f41 nightly on osbuild and switch rawhide and rc's to IF for now?

rebased onto f0c3f0b

3 months ago

pbrobinson commented 3 months ago

It will cause issues, there's a reason we moved to image builder, why hasn't the arm SIG been engaged with this? I literally just saw this by chance because I'm copied in the repo.

Edited 3 months ago by pbrobinson

pbrobinson commented 3 months ago

Also where is the reference to the infra ticket for this 'Unable to start secure instance'? Why are we running rough short over process all of a sudden on a weekend when people can't respond? cc: @mattdm

kevin commented 3 months ago

The only change so far (this is not merged yet) is that I reverted in rawhide so we could get a compose.

The unable to start has been noted in filed compose tickets and we have been talking to the osbuild folks on matrix about it. I don't know if they have any upstream ticket tracking it.

adamwill commented 3 months ago

Right, it's not an infra issue because we don't run that infra. All we can do is wait on the IB team. This is a problem because we can't realistically expect weekend responses from them, but that is cutting into our ability to build and test 41 composes, which we do want to use the weekend for. Still, we did report this to them I think a week ago at least at this point?

Peter, is it viable at all to build the image with IF to get a compose done? I did see the reference in the Change to this letting us drop "workarounds" but I couldn't find any specific details about what changes it enabled, and all the other arm disk images are still built with IF.

adamwill commented 3 months ago

Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320081 to have wider co-ordination on this. Sounds like we should not merge this PR.

Pull-Request has been closed by adamwill

3 months ago