This is easily doable but faces the problem and depending on pygit2 which itself depends on libgit2 and installing in a virtual environment requires one to be very cautious to match the pygit2 version to the libgit2 version installed on the system.

So I'm not entirely sure making pagure available on pypi will help so much.

What do you think?

ping? Do you still think this would be valuable?

I think it could be valuable to have a Pagure on pypi.
It would make Pagure available on the majority of GUN/Linux and BSD systems.

I like the idea to make pagure more visible but given the fact that the user experience might not be good, we should discuss that further at a later point, I put it on the milestone for 6.0 but have the feeling that we should find maintainer for distribution specific packages instead.

We already have distribution packages in a number of places:

• Fedora (and RHEL through EPEL): https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pagure/pagure/
• openSUSE Tumbleweed and Leap: https://software.opensuse.org/package/pagure
• SUSE Linux Enterprise through PackageHub: https://packagehub.suse.com/packages/pagure/
• Mageia: https://madb.mageia.org/package/show/name/pagure/release/cauldron/application/0
• Debian: https://packages.debian.org/sid/pagure
• Ubuntu: https://packages.ubuntu.com/lunar/pagure
• Arch Linux AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pagure

Obviously more places are desirable. :wink: