I hope I caught everything. It tries to make several versions more dynamical (not sure if it really works).
Resolves #871
this probably needs to be in
`+%{dist}+`
way. Because {dist} will expand to nothing.
{dist}
this probably needs to be in +%{dist}+ way. Because {dist} will expand to nothing.
this probably needs to be in +%{dist}+
+%{dist}+
Is it just the one specific location or is it generic remark? I still somehow missing the meaning of + ...
+
Backticks format text with a fixed width font.
Pluses make stuff in them verbatim - no special ASCIIDoc meaning of symbols.
If you need to use an actual plus, you can use more pluses at boundary (pluses are like violence - if it doesn't help, you just haven't used enough).
rebased onto 9fcfa39e898fcaf0018581555822fd8a220760f9
Per @ignatenkobrain request, I have updated the two headings.
rebased onto 64c519cd57b1f3654ca00da206802a1b54ce8e21
I've merged this with few small fixes in a45cae6ff9a46a1dd62f0024049c030b1c479732
Pull-Request has been closed by ignatenkobrain
Actually, will this be expanded correctly: `+%{{CURRENTVER}}+`
`+%{{CURRENTVER}}+`
I hope I caught everything. It tries to make several versions more dynamical (not sure if it really works).
Resolves #871