This PR includes updates to 3 example files displayed on this page https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/#_examples to make consistent with adoption of SPDX ids
Signed-off-by: Jilayne Lovejoy
@ref for your awareness
Somehow two of these changes got done some time ago; I think there must have been an unmerged PR pending when you submitted this, and it was merged in the meantime. However, the changes aren't the same:
The change from BSD to MIT (second commit) isn't there. The third commit changes to Apache-2.0 but what's there now is Apache-2.0-or-later.
I could just do the BSD to MIT change directly, but I'm not sure what to do about third commit. If you'd like me to just fix things up to what you've indicated in this PR, just let me know. Or feel free to update the PR and I'll merge it.
I submitted the other change to change every example to use SPDX identifiers. Sorry for creating conflicts. Apache-2.0-or-later is invalid and should be Apache-2.0. That should be applied in addition to the BSD -> MIT change.
Apache-2.0-or-later
Apache-2.0
I'm not sure what I need to do here... but looking at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/#_simple_source_package
there are still some wrong license ids... ??
The operator has to be upper case. I.e. Apache-2.0 AND BSD-3-Clause
I created #1289 which does the BSD -> MIT fix as well as fixing Apace-2.0-or-later to Apache-2.0. It keeps the upper-case AND that is there currently. Closing this in favor of that one.
Pull-Request has been closed by tibbs
This PR includes updates to 3 example files displayed on this page https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/#_examples to make consistent with adoption of SPDX ids
Signed-off-by: Jilayne Lovejoy