#1199 Update LicensingGuidelines links (again)
Merged 2 years ago by tibbs. Opened 2 years ago by jlovejoy.
jlovejoy/packaging-committee jl-packaging-licensing-typos  into  master

@@ -75,12 +75,12 @@ 

  

  The `License:` field refers to the licenses of the contents of the *_binary_* rpm.

  

- This policy and examples can be found at xref:legal::license-field.adoc/[License: field in spec file].

+ This policy and examples can be found at xref:legal::license-field.adoc[License: field in spec file].

  

  === Valid License Short Names

  

  The `+License:+` field for new packages as of July 2022 must be filled with the appropriate SPDX license identifier or 

- expression from the list of xref:legal::allowed-licenses.adoc/[allowed licenses] for Fedora.

+ expression from the list of xref:legal::allowed-licenses.adoc[allowed licenses] for Fedora.

  Note that some licenses may be allowed for only certain types of material, e.g., fonts, content, or documentation.

  

  The https://spdx.org/licenses/[SPDX License List] provides identifiers for each individual license 
@@ -88,12 +88,12 @@ 

  SPDX license expressions cover situations where multiple licenses apply to a package, where there is a choice 

  of a license, and where licenses are coupled with exceptions or additional permissions. 

  

- xref:legal::license-field.adoc/[License: field in Spec file] contains examples 

+ xref:legal::license-field.adoc[License: field in Spec file] contains examples 

  and further explanations for using SPDX expressions in the `License:` field.

  

  For more information on what to do if you find a license that is not on the Fedora list, 

  does not have a corresponding SPDX license identifier or expression, or other process questions, 

- see xref:legal::license-review-process.adoc/[License Review Process].

+ see xref:legal::license-review-process.adoc[License Review Process].

  

  

  

@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ 

  

  == License for binary packages

  

- See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field.adoc[License: field in Spec file] guidance specific to Rust.

+ See xref:legal::license-field.adoc[License: field in Spec file] guidance specific to Rust.

   

  

  == Miscellaneous

maybe the third time is a charm...

Signed-off-by: Jilayne Lovejoy

1 new commit added

  • fix link on Rust page too
2 years ago

Pull-Request has been merged by tibbs

2 years ago