| |
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@
|
| |
|
| |
If package scriptlets call other systemd tools, for example `systemd-tmpfiles`,
|
| |
the package SHOULD declare appropriate dependencies.
|
| |
- The `%systemd_requires` macro is a shortcut to require systemd for the
|
| |
+ The `+%{?systemd_requires}+` macro is a shortcut to require systemd for the
|
| |
`%pre`, `%post`, and `%postun` scriptlets.
|
| |
Note that those dependencies are **not** required for the
|
| |
`%systemd_{post,preun,postun_with_restart,user_post,user_preun}`
|
| |
@@ -456,10 +456,14 @@
|
| |
|
| |
If the package wants to use systemd tools if they are available,
|
| |
but does not want to declare a dependency,
|
| |
- then the `%systemd_ordering` macro MAY be used
|
| |
- as a weaker form of `%systemd_requires`
|
| |
+ then the `+%{?systemd_ordering}+` macro MAY be used
|
| |
+ as a weaker form of `+%{?systemd_requires}+`
|
| |
that only declares an ordering during an RPM transaction.
|
| |
|
| |
+ NOTE: The macros take the form `+%{?systemd_requires}+`
|
| |
+ instead of `+%systemd_requires+` to allow the specfile to parse properly
|
| |
+ in the case where the systemd macros have yet to be installed.
|
| |
+
|
| |
===== Macro details
|
| |
|
| |
For details on what these macros evaluate to, refer to the following sources:
|
| |
tibbs
commented 2 years ago
Recommend %{?systemd_requires} and such instead of %systemd_requires so
the specfile will still parse if systemd-rpm-macros is not installed.
Fixes #1023