| |
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
| |
:abi-comparison-tool: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_check_for_ABI_changes_in_a_package[ABI comparison tool]
|
| |
:packaging-committee: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee[Fedora Packaging Committee]
|
| |
:scl-guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)[Software Collections]
|
| |
- :updates-policy: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy[Updates Policy]
|
| |
+ :updates-policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/[Updates Policy]
|
| |
:toc: macro
|
| |
|
| |
The Packaging Guidelines are a collection of common issues
|
| |
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
|
| |
For documents which cover those issues,
|
| |
please see the following:
|
| |
|
| |
- * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join[Joining the package collection maintainers]
|
| |
- * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors[New package process for existing contributors]
|
| |
+ * https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/[Join the Package Maintainers]
|
| |
+ * https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_Existing_Contributors/[New Package Process for Existing Contributors]
|
| |
* https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-rpm-packages/index.html[Creating RPM packages]
|
| |
|
| |
It is the package reviewer's responsibility to point out specific problems with a package
|
| |
@@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@
|
| |
Patch0: gnome-panel-fix-frobnicator.patch
|
| |
....
|
| |
|
| |
- Sending patches upstream and adding this comment will help ensure that Fedora is acting as a good FLOSS citizen (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream[Why Upstream?]). It will help others (and even you) down the line in package maintenance by knowing what patches are likely to appear in a new upstream release.
|
| |
+ Sending patches upstream and adding this comment will help ensure that Fedora is acting as a good FLOSS citizen (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Staying_Close_to_Upstream_Projects/[Staying Close to Upstream Projects]). It will help others (and even you) down the line in package maintenance by knowing what patches are likely to appear in a new upstream release.
|
| |
|
| |
==== If upstream doesn't have a bug tracker
|
| |
|
| |
@@ -2050,7 +2050,7 @@
|
| |
[#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages]
|
| |
== Renaming/Replacing Existing Packages
|
| |
|
| |
- NOTE: FESCo has a https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required[package renaming policy] that should be followed when renaming an existing package.
|
| |
+ NOTE: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Renaming_Process/[Package Renaming Process] should be followed when renaming an existing package.
|
| |
|
| |
In the event that it becomes necessary to rename or replace an existing package, the new package should make the change transparent to end users to the extent applicable.
|
| |
|
| |
Package Maintainer Docs have moved
from wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org.
Update links to point to the new location.