From 53c552e20743915477259a71cc72c5d3822089a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rafael Fontenelle Date: Jul 03 2020 17:49:49 +0000 Subject: Reduce heading levels to fix Untitled page --- diff --git a/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/PkgConfigBuildRequires.adoc b/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/PkgConfigBuildRequires.adoc index 1884f08..22ba4e9 100644 --- a/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/PkgConfigBuildRequires.adoc +++ b/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/PkgConfigBuildRequires.adoc @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -== BuildRequires: pkgconfig(foo) vs. foo-devel += BuildRequires: pkgconfig(foo) vs. foo-devel Fedora packages which use `+pkg-config+` to build against a library (e.g. 'foo') on which they depend, *SHOULD* express their build dependency correctly as `+pkgconfig(foo)+`. -=== Rationale +== Rationale The build infrastructure for a given package will often locate and use required libraries by using `+pkg-config+`. @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ For historical reasons, many packages seem to have a hard-coded "`+BuildRequires Note that it shall still be acceptable to require specific packages by name if they are required for some reason _other_ than a `+pkg-config+` module that they provide. -=== Example +== Example Packages which build against `+libproxy+` should contain the following: