| |
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
|
| |
* *SHOULD*: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. footnote:[xref:LicensingGuidelines.adoc#_license_text[Licensing Guidelines: License Text\]] +
|
| |
* *SHOULD*: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. footnote:[xref:index.adoc#_summary_and_description[Packaging Guidelines: Summary and description\]] +
|
| |
* *SHOULD*: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. footnote:[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Mock_to_test_package_builds[Using Mock to test package builds\]] +
|
| |
- * *SHOULD*: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. footnote:xref:index.adoc#_architecture_support[Packaging Guidelines: Architecture Support\]] +
|
| |
+ * *SHOULD*: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. footnote:[xref:index.adoc#_architecture_support[Packaging Guidelines: Architecture Support\]] +
|
| |
* *SHOULD*: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. +
|
| |
* *SHOULD*: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. footnote:[xref:index.adoc#_scriptlets[Packaging Guidelines: Scriptlets\]] +
|
| |
* *SHOULD*: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. footnote:[xref:index.adoc#_requiring_base_package[Packaging Guidelines: Requiring Base Package\]] +
|
| |
rffontenelle
commented 3 years ago
The missing square bracket resulted in the text like "... all supported architectures. footnote:Packaging Guidelines: Architecture Support]"