It should be clearer, more opinionated, and take into account:
– updates of The OpenType standard
– variable fonts
– web fonts
– upstream depreciation of non OpenType formats: final stages of the Harfbuzz
consolidation decided at the 2006 Text Layout summit
– appstream & fonts
– weak dependencies
– and probably more I forget here
It is based on the new fonts-rpm-macros project for automation:
This project builds on tooling enhancements in redhat-rpm-config and rpm
itself, done during the past two years for the Forge and Go sets of packaging
macros. It started 2 years ago as a fork of fontpackages, which is the core of
our current fonts packaging guidelines.
It will require putting the fonts-srpm-macros package in the default build
root, like is done for other domain-specific packaging macro sets.
– better documentation (clearer and more complete)
– better automation (less packager hassle for better and more complete results)
– tools and scripts
– fixing metadata with ttname
Mostly because no one seems willing to maintain those scripts, or port ttname
to python 3.
showcases the new policy on 62 real-world source packages, generating 139 installation packages. Some of those are badly delayed updates to Fedora packages, others are brand-new packages ready for Fedora inclusion. They include major font packages such as Stix, DejaVu, Droid, IBM Plex.
Existing Fedora packages will continue to build, the old fontpackages macros are grandfathered in fonts-rpm-macros for now. They will be removed in a few years to give packagers time to apply the new guidelines.
Metadata Update from @james:
- Issue tagged with: meeting
We discussed this at this weeks meeting (https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-11-21/fpc.2019-11-21-17.00.txt):
...this will probably be on hold until early next year, as people don't have enough free time to look at it.
to comment on this ticket.