http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-May/007063.html
The %posttrans version of this was passed. Needs to be written as a draft and sent to FESCo for ratification.
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-26/fedora-meeting.2010-05-26-16.15.log.html#l-210
These are all related:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mclasen/giomodules https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mclasen/gdkpixbufloaders https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mclasen/gtkmodules https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSettings_Draft
The GSettings draft has been updated and is ready for voting. Since this follows the same pattern as the other three drafts, we can vote in the ticket:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSettings_Draft
I'm +1 to it.
+1
re: Gsettings , why isn't %postun wrapped with: {{{if [$1 -eq 0]; then ... ; fi}}} ?
not that it's broken without it, +1 (just wonderin)
Added wrappers to skip the %post script on update (because %postun is run after %post) for all four of the drafts. This doesn't change the semantics, just allows us to skip running the cache update twice per package when it's being updated.
Everything has been written up. Spot's handling the update text.
Oops misread. Anouncement text:
rpm %post and %postun scripts have been added for the following important pieces of GNOME3 technology: GSettings, gdk-pixbuf loaders, GTK3 modules, and GIO modules:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#gdk-pixbuf_loaders https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_modules https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GIO_modules
Login to comment on this ticket.