I'm splitting up the X.org superpackages to be one tool per package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XorgUtilityDeaggregation
I'm hoping for an exception to the normal process to file just one bug per superpackage. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874138 for an example.
+1
Didn't @eclipseo review the packages already? So is this only about not having to open the bugs individually?
+1 to handle everything in one bugzilla
This is about splitting up Xorg, not about reviewing ~1k golang packages...
I reviewed the packages, most of the problems come from not installing the license and docs files, and a couple of packages with no description.
@ngompa I am aware. Look at the linked BugZilla :)
+1 vote from me. Forgot to add that to my last message.
+1, thanks for being on top of those reviews @eclipseo.
Technically this is approved with (+4, 0, -0), right?
The xorg utils deaggregation Change for F34 is kinda depending on this.
Have a +1 if needed.
Sure, we should probably have a general rule about splitting packages out of already reviewed packages ... but +1 anyway.
Metadata Update from @james: - Issue tagged with: meeting
+1 and I think that's +6 now.
We were too slow to move here, it appears. The packages are now all reviewed and imported into Fedora already: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2584#comment-720276
Metadata Update from @james: - Issue close_status updated to: accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.