From 5a5fd718fa7dda9b92c0c939173446518292ce60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Igor Gnatenko Date: Oct 07 2018 10:11:02 +0000 Subject: licensing: fix broken links Fixes: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/810 Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko --- diff --git a/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/LicensingGuidelines.adoc b/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/LicensingGuidelines.adoc index f3d35ae..89c4617 100644 --- a/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/LicensingGuidelines.adoc +++ b/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/LicensingGuidelines.adoc @@ -1,10 +1,13 @@ = Licensing Guidelines +:url-fedora-licensing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing +:fedora-licensing-list: {url-fedora-licensing}#SoftwareLicenses[Fedora licensing list] +:fedora-licensing: {url-fedora-licensing}[Fedora Licensing] == Fedora Licensing The goal of the Fedora Project is to work with the Linux community to create a complete, general purpose operating system exclusively from Free and Open Source software. -All software in Fedora must be under licenses in the link:Licensing#SoftwareLicenses[Fedora licensing list] . This list is based on the licenses approved by the http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses[Free Software Foundation] , http://www.opensource.org/licenses/[OSI] and consultation with Red Hat Legal. +All software in Fedora must be under licenses in the {fedora-licensing-list}. This list is based on the licenses approved by the https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses[Free Software Foundation], https://opensource.org/licenses/[OSI] and consultation with Red Hat Legal. If code is multiple licensed, and at least one of the licenses is approved for Fedora, that code can be included in Fedora under the approved license(s) (but only under the terms of the approved license(s)). @@ -45,7 +48,7 @@ If a source package generates multiple binary packages, the License: field may d === Valid License Short Names -The `+License:+` field must be filled with the appropriate license Short License identifier(s) from the "Good License" tables on the link:Licensing[ Fedora Licensing] page. If your license does not appear in the tables, it needs to be sent to legal@lists.fedoraproject.org (note that this list is moderated, only members may directly post). If the license is approved, it will be added to the appropriate table. +The `+License:+` field must be filled with the appropriate license Short License identifier(s) from the "Good License" tables on the {fedora-licensing} page. If your license does not appear in the tables, it needs to be sent to legal@lists.fedoraproject.org (note that this list is moderated, only members may directly post). If the license is approved, it will be added to the appropriate table. === "Distributable" @@ -57,7 +60,7 @@ The `+License:+` field for any firmware that disallows modification should be se === Versioned licenses -Some licenses include the version as part of the Short License Identifier. This is only done when multiple versions of the license differ in significant ways (e.g. one revision is GPLv2 incompatible, while a later version is not). Be careful to ensure that you use the correct Short License Identifier, as shown in the tables on the link:Licensing[ Fedora Licensing] page. +Some licenses include the version as part of the Short License Identifier. This is only done when multiple versions of the license differ in significant ways (e.g. one revision is GPLv2 incompatible, while a later version is not). Be careful to ensure that you use the correct Short License Identifier, as shown in the tables on the {fedora-licensing} page. === "or later version" licenses @@ -66,7 +69,7 @@ Please note that there are already special Short License Identifiers for GPLv2+ === GPL and LGPL -Since compatibility of code and library linking is especially complex with GPL and LGPL, Fedora packages can no longer simply use "GPL" or "LGPL" in the `+License:+` field. Please refer to the link:Licensing[ Fedora Licensing] page for the acceptable identifiers, and be careful to ensure that you select the correct one. +Since compatibility of code and library linking is especially complex with GPL and LGPL, Fedora packages can no longer simply use "GPL" or "LGPL" in the `+License:+` field. Please refer to the {fedora-licensing} page for the acceptable identifiers, and be careful to ensure that you select the correct one. === Dual Licensing Scenarios