#31 syntax with check_modulemd has fallen out of sync
Opened 2 years ago by langdon. Modified 6 days ago

First and foremost, this is not mapped to the the readme in the check_modulemd repo (different deps for example)

Couple of comments:
a) can we "remote import it" some how?
b) push the docker container to r.fp.o or docker hub and tell people to just use that?


Metadata Update from @igulina:
- Issue priority set to: high

2 years ago

I don't think we should document this on the page - let's just link to the repo so people can read the up-to-date readme. https://github.com/fedora-modularity/check_modulemd

Metadata Update from @asamalik:
- Issue priority set to: None (was: high)

2 years ago

Metadata Update from @langdon:
- Issue priority set to: high

2 years ago

The tool was used by Taskotron but currently isn't, I think.
Not sure what the current status is. @nphilipp, can you look at this?

Metadata Update from @nphilipp:
- Issue assigned to asamalik

6 months ago

Assigning to @asamalik as per today's WG meeting.
/cc @langdon

Metadata Update from @langdon:
- Issue tagged with: Meeting

2 months ago

@langdon can you clarify why you scheduled this for being discussed on the meeting? Actually, I don't really get what the whole ticket is about. :wink:

I'll hold off with putting it on the agenda for now because you said you won't make it today.

Metadata Update from @nphilipp:
- Issue tagged with: Needs-Info

a month ago

@langdon, ping-e-di-ping? What's this about?

OK, so this ticket is about having global CI checks for modules in Fedora. We have seen a lot of changes to the CI infra over the life of this ticket. Suffice to say, the ticket was opened to say "this check isn't working right, please fix".

At this point, I am not sure if we should just close this ticket and open some new CI ones or what. The Epic https://tree.taiga.io/project/modularity-wg/epic/21 is related but is for individual modules. I don't see anything in taiga about universal tests (like a module linter) for modules in the Fedora Infra.

@psabata how would you like to proceed here

At this point, I am not sure if we should just close this ticket and open some new CI ones or what.

Sounds sensible, lets us avoid mentioning old long dead tools and confuse people (yours truly :wink:).

Metadata Update from @nphilipp:
- Issue untagged with: Needs-Info

6 days ago

Metadata Update from @nphilipp:
- Issue untagged with: Meeting

6 days ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata