dsadm looks too much like dsidm. We should rename it to dsctl, to make it unique, but also to prevent possible name conflicts.
Metadata Update from @firstyear: - Issue assigned to firstyear
Metadata Update from @firstyear: - Custom field Origin adjusted to Community - Custom field Review Status adjusted to review
Metadata Update from @mreynolds: - Custom field Review Status adjusted to ack (was: review)
commit 08a4c30bc496f34a77d7411121a1d859e21eba45 To ssh://git@pagure.io/lib389.git 649d807..08a4c30 master -> master
Metadata Update from @firstyear: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Opps, forgot the dsctl file!
Metadata Update from @firstyear: - Custom field Review Status adjusted to review (was: ack) - Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)
Metadata Update from @spichugi: - Custom field Review Status adjusted to ack (was: review)
commit f9b92f616cd602b04d66fd111d93be80d88a4ee8 To ssh://git@pagure.io/lib389.git e8dc7f1..cc6e810 master -> master
Metadata Update from @firstyear: - Custom field Review Status adjusted to review (was: ack) - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)