This seats on the top of https://pagure.io/greenwave/pull-request/62

Unit-tests are passing but I didn't touch the integration tests. If someone could look at them it would be appreciated.

I kicked out the commit from #62 to make the review easier (esp since I don't rely on it)

OK, I cherry-picked a piece from #63 onto this and pushed it to a pre-release-2017-08-23 branch. I'm going to cut a pre-release rpm from it to test with.

And.. it's in "prod". @pingou, try out a test script like this (see the url, which changed):
#!/usr/bin/env python
import requests

nvr = 'kernel-4.13.0-0.rc6.git2.1.fc28'
url = 'https://greenwave-web-greenwave.app.os.fedoraproject.org/api/v1.0/decision'
data = dict(
    # https://pagure.io/greenwave/blob/master/f/conf/policies/fedora.yaml
    decision_context='bodhi_update_push_stable',
    product_version='fedora-26',
    subject=[
        {'item': nvr, 'type': 'koji_build'},
        {'original_spec_nvr': nvr},
        {'item': 'FOO-123', 'type': 'bodhi_update'},
    ],
)
print("Querying %s with:" % url)
import pprint; pprint.pprint(data)
response = requests.post(url, json=data)
print("Got %r" % response)
import pprint; pprint.pprint(response.json())

So as I understand, we could drop #62 and #63 and use this one to solve logical disjunction discribed in #62, right? This patch looks good to me and as pingou said, we just need to add the missing functional tests which we can get from Ralph's patches, :-)

Do not worry, I think I have misunderstood sth here since Dan told me this is sth you have to do for your flock talk.

Dan told me this is sth you have to do for your flock talk.

Well yes and no, I also think this may be the way we integrate CI results for as long as it only supports a subset of Fedora's packages.

So as I understand, we could drop #62 and #63

As described in #68 we actually do need #63 but I think we can drop #62 indeed.

OK - I would like to back this out in favor of #75. Let's take discussion there.