There are new test result outcomes (QUEUED, RUNNING) which should be considered as missing results.
:( uff... it was mine and it was almost done :( I'll just submit my tests when this one gets merged. Reviewing now this one...
I would put if result['outcome' in ('QUEUED', 'RUNNING'), because we also have "NOT_APPLICABLE" as additional result outcomes and we don't know what we will have in the future.
Would this early return short-circuit the waiver checking which happens in the next stanza?
return
@ralph That's right, my bad. I'm dropping this PR anyway in favor of PR#303. I don't want to steal Giulia's fame. :)
@gnaponie Is "NOT_APPLICABLE" mentioned somewhere?
@lholecek only in the internal instance afaik. You can check the internal task FACTORY-2035 for more information.
Closing in favor of #303.
Pull-Request has been closed by ralph
There are new test result outcomes (QUEUED, RUNNING) which should be
considered as missing results.