Description of problem:

In 7.1 we have the two backends in the same instance ( dc=<main suffix> and
o=ipaca ).

For dc=<main suffix> we have all cli operations needed to ruv management but
for backend o=ipaca we don't have that and most of the operations have to be 
done manually.

I am proposing to add these commands to ipa-csreplica-manage or if not, as the
command is quite similar, add a sort of option --ca to ipa-replica-manage and
then, all the commands related to ruv management will use as suffix "o=ipaca"
instead of "dc=<main suffix>". In this case, the change is minimal.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ipa-server-4.1


How reproducible: this is a sort of rfe. It's always reproducible.

Actual results:

I have this RUV that I cannot manage:


[root@idm-master ~]# ldapsearch -xLLL -D "cn=directory manager" -W -b "o=ipaca"
'(&(nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff)(objectclass=nstombstone))'
Enter LDAP Password:
dn: cn=replica,cn=o\3Dipaca,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
objectClass: top
objectClass: nsDS5Replica
objectClass: extensibleobject
nsDS5ReplicaRoot: o=ipaca
nsDS5ReplicaType: 3
nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: cn=Replication Manager masterAgreement1-idm-replica.exampl
 e.org-pki-tomcat,ou=csusers,cn=config
cn: replica
nsDS5ReplicaId: 96
nsDS5Flags: 1
nsState:: YAAAAAAAAACptjBVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAA==
nsDS5ReplicaName: 493b2e05-d86111e4-966cbf09-b69875c6
nsds50ruv: {replicageneration} 551bd4cd000000600000
nsds50ruv: {replica 96 ldap://idm-master.example.org:389} 551bd4d6000000600000
  5530b6aa000000600000
nsds50ruv: {replica 97 ldap://idm-replica.example.org:389} 551bd4f500000061000
 0 551d2648000000610000
nsds5agmtmaxcsn: o=ipaca;masterAgreement1-idm-replica.example.org-pki-tomcat;i
 dm-replica.example.org;389;97;5530b6aa000000600000
nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 96 ldap://idm-master.example.org:389} 5530b
 6a9
nsruvReplicaLastModified: {replica 97 ldap://idm-replica.example.org:389} 0000
 0000
nsds5ReplicaChangeCount: 1623
nsds5replicareapactive: 0

[root@idm-master ~]#



Expected results:


To be able to manage this ruv.



Additional info:


I don't think it's a priority bug. But it will be nice to be coherent and be
able to apply same sort of operations in all the replicated backends.