From a40f16b36ef62ba542dea7f034a3dfd38850918f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy Dawson <tdawson@redhat.com>
Date: Jun 07 2023 21:41:52 +0000
Subject: remove discussion point


---

diff --git a/modules/ROOT/pages/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades.adoc b/modules/ROOT/pages/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades.adoc
index b30213a..1f5f33b 100644
--- a/modules/ROOT/pages/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades.adoc
+++ b/modules/ROOT/pages/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades.adoc
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ named new package (e.g. foo2) to provide the newer version.
 [[discussion_points]]
 == Discussion points
 
-. How to short-circuit process for critical security updates
 . Approval process - majority of those present seems to be lax, but
 being there's no body such as FESCo in "charge" of EPEL (yes, I realize
 that FESCo has oversight, but oversight != make day-to-day decisions