PR#4: Fix problem in dnf.sack.query() with reponame - fm-dnf-plugin

fm-dnf-plugin

#4 Fix problem in dnf.sack.query() with reponame

Merged 7 years ago by jkaluza. Opened 7 years ago by jmracek.

jmracek/fm-dnf-plugin dnf-api into master

Fix problem in module upgrade

Jaroslav Mracek • 7 years ago

41a8a40

fm/api_clients.py

file modified

+3 -3

		`@@ -252,9 +252,9 @@`

		`self._dnfsetup()`
		`reponame = self._repo_id(module_name)`
		`- pkg_specs = [str(pkg) for pkg in self.dnfbase.sack.query().installed()`
		`- if pkg.from_repo == reponame]`
		`-`
		`+ pkg_specs = [pkg.name for pkg in self.dnfbase.sack.query().installed()`
		`+ if pkg.from_repo == '@' + reponame]`
		`+ done = False`
		`for pkg_spec in pkg_specs:`
		`try:`
		`self.dnfbase.upgrade(pkg_spec, reponame)`

jmracek commented 7 years ago

The pkg attribute from_repo returns '@' + reponame if information in yum_db is
available. Otherwise it returns reponame (like for available packages).