#2958 F38 incomplete changes: 100% complete deadline
Closed: Accepted a year ago by zbyszek. Opened a year ago by bcotton.

On Tuesday, 21 February we reached the Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (100% complete). At this milestone all the 38 Changes should be fully complete, which is indicated by "ON_QA" status of a tracking bug. A Bugzilla query shows all the tracking bugs which are not in "ON_QA" state and are not considered complete. System-Wide Changes with the contingency date in bold are past the stated contingency date.

These changes are presented for FESCo review to determine what action, if any, should be taken.

System-Wide Changes

  • LLVM 16
    • Owner: @tstellar
    • Contingency mechanism: If there are major problems with LLVM 16, the compatibility package provide a way for other packages to continue using LLVM 15.
    • Contingency deadline: Final freeze
  • Unified kernel support (phase 1)
    • Owner: @kraxel
    • Contingency mechanism: Probably none
    • Contingency deadline: (none provided)
  • RPM Macros for Build Flags
    • Owner: @tstellar
    • Contingency mechanism: Change owner will revert the update to redhat-rpm-config
    • Contingency deadline: Beta freeze

Self-Contained Changes

Updates


Metadata Update from @bcotton:
- Issue tagged with: meeting

a year ago

Node.js repackaging is done; I marked the wrong state on the BZ ticket. That is now corrected.

I spoke with @tstellar about the LLVM situation. Apparently the issue is that LLVM has historically made backwards-incompatible changes even within RCs, so they don't land it in Fedora until the upstream release. This will happen prior to GA freeze.

Regarding RPM Macros for Build Flags. There was some additional feedback given after it was approved by FESCO asking to rename and drop some of the new macros. So we either need to revert this change or merge https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/244

Can we please just merge this PR? It's just a rename for a new feature.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/244 was merged (during the previous fesco meeting even).

I'm keeping this on the meeting agenda, but I don't think there's anything to do at this point in time.

This was discussed during today's FESCo meeting. We agree that the remaining changes seem to be on track and we don't need to do anything at this point.

Metadata Update from @zbyszek:
- Issue untagged with: meeting
- Issue close_status updated to: Accepted
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

a year ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata