Hi, this came to my attention because of a Fedora legal list post. In reading the #2153 ticket, a concern I have is that FESCo may have reached its approval decision assuming that the prebuilt Intel binaries are under a license that is normally acceptable for Fedora source (and binary) code.

E.g. npmccallum said: "The code for all three is available under a BSD license"

And subsequently puiterwijk said "they are available under an appropriate license"

While the license may be acceptable (we've asked to have it submitted for review) it has a novel feature that AFAIK hasn't been considered before (and which, if found acceptable, would require a change to the definition of what makes a firmware license legally acceptable) and I think FESCo should take another look at this in case for some reason the conclusion they reached was based on the assumption that the license applicable here was a normal BSD license. The fact that the conclusion here was this is okay "provided that Fedora Legal concurs" may signify that I am reading something into the discussion that wasn't actually there but just want to make sure, particularly since this is not firmware in the traditional Fedora sense.