fas username: @michich package: gajim and python-nbxmpp (gajim requires python-nbxmpp and python-nbxmpp is only used by gajim) issues to fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857419 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884903 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854658 (and more) nonresponsive maintainer bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931243 (I just noticed that I forgot to open a separate bug for python-nbxmpp, should I still do that?) fedora-devel mail: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/GY4MJ5ANLED6RCT3RMC6Q6Q7NF7NH3S2/ comainainers: none additional notes: I am a packager, have open PRs to bring gajim and python-nbxmpp up-to-date (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gajim/pull-request/4, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nbxmpp/pull-request/3) and would be happy to (co-)maintain the packages.
This is a ticket for the Fedora's Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
I just noticed that I forgot to open a separate bug for python-nbxmpp, should I still do that?
No. One bug is enough.
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue tagged with: nonresponsive maintainer
+1
@michich Are you still interested in maintaining your Fedora packages?
@suraia you are now a co-maintainer of gajim and python-nbxmpp
I am happy to have a co-maintainer. @suraia Thank you for your interest in maintaining the packages. Feel free to proceed with the package updates.
@churchyard Yes, I am still interested in Fedora packaging. Do not remove me yet. Thanks!
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue close_status updated to: Rejected - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.