+1

+1

+1

EDIT: Well, +1, other than the contingency mechanism being not a contingency mechanism, again. Pointing users towards the 10.4 module if the "ursine" packages are broken isn't good. So -1 for now, until that is clarified.

Pretty much -1 on the contingency mechanism as well. The discussion seemed to move to a direction to change it, but so far it did not happen.

We're still waiting for an update of the contingency mechanism.

I update the contingency plan to state that it is the revert of the change by bumping mariadb epoch

+1

Thanks. +1

I've updated the contingency fields: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FMariaDB_10.5&type=revision&diff=594817&oldid=594809

+1

+1

A week after the update, this is (+5, 0, -0). The change is APPROVED.