fas username: @fnasser package: objectweb-asm, gnu-getopt, jakarta-oro, jgroups, saxpath issues to fix: open RHBZs nonresponsive maintainer bug: RHBZ#1868600 fedora-devel mail: devel list post from August 13 comainainers: @dwalluck @mizdebsk @jjohnstn @lef (non-responsive last year) @gil (non-responsive last year) @goldmann @dbhole @akurtakov additional notes: jjames and I already updated objectweb-asm since it was blocking some bug-fixes and other updates.
According to koji, fnasser has not done any packaging work since 2010.
This is a ticket for the Fedora's Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
+1
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue tagged with: nonresponsive maintainer
@decathorpe do you want to be added as a co-maintainer / take over later?
There's no hurry. Orphan the packages later, and I'll take the ones we need for the Java SIG.
A week has passed, at this point we shall ask the maintainer to respond, but they don't have a Pagure account, so I'll email them.
Funny, I did not receive any e-mail, I wonder why.
My interest on these packages was for the packaging of a JBoss server so if there is someone interested in taking over maintainership I wouldn't mind releasing them.
It is weird, you should've gotten several emails (either about objectweb-asm issues or about the nonresponsive bug) ...
Not sure what you want to do with those packages, but they are no longer required by any other packages in fedora.
It would be great if the @java-maint-sig group had access to those packages without having to rely on provenpackagers to fix things :)
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue assigned to fnasser
so if there is someone interested in taking over maintainership I wouldn't mind releasing them.
@decathorpe So, may I reassign jakarta-oro, objectweb-asm, saxpath and xml-commons-resolver to you?
Yes, please.
Giving rpms/jakarta-oro to decathorpe Giving rpms/objectweb-asm to decathorpe Giving rpms/saxpath to decathorpe Giving rpms/xml-commons-resolver to decathorpe
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue close_status updated to: Accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.