+1

I somewhat don't agree that maintainers need to check if their packages build with 10.x or change BRs to 9.x package. I'd like to see this analysis done by owners of this change and submissions of necessary PRs and/or rebuild of packages.

Since I think it is important to ship llvm10, I'm +1.

I somewhat don't agree that maintainers need to check if their packages build with 10.x or change BRs to 9.x package. I'd like to see this analysis done by owners of this change and submissions of necessary PRs and/or rebuild of packages.

Maintainers aren't forced to do anything until their next rebuild (which is something they would do anyway with or without this change), so in my opinion it's not that big of a burden on them to change the BRs to 9.x if their package doesn't build with 10.

We also don't want packages to depend on 9.x if upstream supports 10.x. If we go through ahead of time and convert all the non-building BRs to 9.x, I'm concerned that maintainers will forget to update the BR to 10.x the next time they rebase.

+1

+1

+1

After a week, this is APPROVED (+5, 0, -0)

Announced.